Showing posts with label Fox News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fox News. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Murdoch and Morris: total incongruity

BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
by Jeffrey Joseph

Rupert Murdoch tends to avoid putting himself in the spotlight, generally preferring to allow his media conglomerate do the talking for him. His recent appearance on The Kalb Report yielded some explanation for keeping away from direct questioning -- Murdoch's statements about ethics in journalism and the actions of FOX appear totally incongruous. Though Murdoch complained other networks's contributors "tend to be Democrats" and that people at FOX "are not Republicans," he need look no further than to Dick Morris's many appearances on the network to find otherwise.

Morris has no qualms about pushing his Republican agenda throughout FOX's programming. Appearing on a show with Sean Hannity, who faces his own set of ethical quandaries, Morris introduced his "adopt-a-Democrat" campaign. Morris intended to create a program so that people could target specific Democrats they despised and fund their Republican opponents, candidates Morris would redirect them toward. As Morris put it, with "every penny you give, we'll go right on the air attacking the Democrat who you adopt." He also leaves no ambiguity to his target audience. Hardly a champion of the middle class, Morris hoped to "get wealthy people" across the nation to fund his Republican attack ads regardless of whether the people live within the district of the Democrat Morris seeks to depose.

In fact, Morris's turn to the right has gotten so hateful toward the Democrats that even fellow FOX personalities have felt compelled to temper his rhetoric. Peter Johnson, Jr., asked Morris on Fox & Friends if Democrats would regret voting for healthcare reform. Morris suggested that Democrats would more than regret it, but also that healthcare would "be a tombstone; the only question is how many Democrats are in the grave.

In light of all the particularly incendiary comments and actions in the current political climate, much of which FOX carries substantial blame for instigating, one would hope that FOX could exercise a little better judgment. Johnson had the wherewithal to correct Morris, in a way, by interjecting, "A political tombstone, Dick." Not long after Laura Ingraham derided MSNBC host Ed Schultz for saying that Dick Cheney's heart was a political football, Morris implying the death of Democrats because of healthcare reform appears in particularly bad taste. Since adding "political" before a sentiment proved inadequate for Johnson's colleague Ingraham, Johnson's qualification of Morris's statement fails FOX's own standard for rhetoric. Thus, Morris is left with a potentially violent and saliently Republican sentiment that he had the opportunity to push on several FOX shows. No wonder that Murdoch failed to name a single Democrat on his network.

Murdoch had a valid point in suggesting a serious news organization would have scores of ethical issues once it began promoting a specific political party. His criticism of the other networks for supporting Democrats, as he alleges, might have had more weight if not for his own network airing Dick Morris on so many shows overtly doing the work of the GOP. In attempting to claim the moral high ground, Murdoch hypocritically accused his competitors of political leaning while keeping unabashed political proponents on his own programming. Either Murdoch has no grasp of what goes on at his network or he simply does not care and the appeal to journalistic ethics serves mostly as window dressing. Whatever the case, viewers should demand Morris receive admonition for his potentially violent and obviously Republican rhetoric -- and in the meantime, choose to Turn Off FOX.

Please send in tips and success stories to turnofffox@gmail.com, look out for us on Twitter @turnofffox, and join us at BuzzFlash in the Campaign to Turn Off FOX News. And please forward this article to a friend. You can drive the message home by obtaining a Turn Off FOX Bumper Sticker. Just Click Here. 

Originally posted at Turn Off FOX.
BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT


Let The Sun Shine In......

Friday, April 9, 2010

Fox Named In Pelosi Death Threat

How many links to crime is it going to take before Faux News is considered by one and all to be a pariah

The AP is reporting that the FBI has arrested a California man for making threatening phone calls to Nancy Pelosi over the health care bill.

In an interview with TPM, FBI spokeswoman Patty Hanson confirmed that a man, Gregory Guisti, 48, would be charged in federal court in San Francisco Thursday at 9:30 PT. Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman will preside over the hearing, during which Guisti will be formally charged.

The AP has more details:
Several federal officials say the man made dozens of calls to Pelosi's homes in California and Washington, as well as to her husband's business office, reciting her home address and saying if she wanted to see it again, she would not support the health care overhaul bill that was recently enacted.
"The FBI takes threats against elected officials very seriously," Hanson said.

The charges against Guisti, who was arrested today, will be unsealed Thursday.

A spokesperson with Pelosi's office tells TPM it has no comment at this time.

The report comes just a day after authorities in Washington state announced charges against a man there for making death threats against Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) over her support for the health care bill.

In the days surrounding the passage of the health care legislation in the House late last month, multiple threats and vandal attacks were made against Democrats around the country.

In a separate case, a Philadelphia man, who was declared mentally unfit to stand trial this week, was charged March 29 with threatening to kill Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA).

Late Update: Here is Pelosi's brief statement on the case.


Let The Sun Shine In......

Trumka Warns of the "Forces of Hate" That Smash the Ideal of America

by: RDemocrat

Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 20:29:00 PM EDT


It is no secret that in this current environment with so many workers unemployed, underemployed and making less money that anger is rampant among American workers. It is understandable as working America watches the bankers who crashed our economy costing them millions of jobs get bailed out while in every town in America they are still hurting. This on top of the fact that Corporate America has stagnated wages on jobs they have not shipped overseas to virtual slave markets. Yes, anger is justified and rampant in many unemployment lines and workplaces. However, working America must be very careful of how to channel this understandable anger. You see, just like in past days forces of hatred are seeking to divide workers keeping them from forming a united front to really change this country and their own lots in life.  
RDemocrat :: Trumka Warns of the "Forces of Hate" That Smash the Ideal of America
With this in mind AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka today spoke to American workers warning them of the forces of hatred that depend on being able to divide them and turn them against one another and their own interests. He spoke of intellectuals speaking out in these times in defense of the working class:
It is all about standing up to entrenched economic power and the complacency of the affluent. It's an alliance that depends on intellectuals being critics, and not the servants, of economic privilege.
http://blog.aflcio.org/2010/04...
He pointed out how the voices of hatred we hear so readily spewing their twisted logic is nothing new, it has been around for a long time and our generation is far from the first to see such a war against working and intellectual America:
This is a similar moment. Our politics have been dominated by greed and the forces of money for a generation. Now, amid the wreckage that came from that experiment, we hear the voices of hatred, of racism and homophobia. I think this is an important point to make here at Harvard. The economic elites at JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs and the other big Wall Street banks are happy to hire intellectual servants wherever they can find them. But the stronger the alliance between intellectuals and economic elites, the more the forces of hatred-of anti-intellectualism-will grow.
He called on intellectuals and working families to be part of the solution, shunning these voices of hatred that would make America in to a clone of Europe in the Dark Ages and band together and fight for an economy that works for all giving working men and women a voice once again in our Republic:
If you care about defending our country against the apostles of hate, you need to be part of the fight to rebuild a sustainable, high wage economy built on good jobs-the kind of economy that can only exist when working men and women have a real voice on the job.
Go here to read the full text of Trumka's speech:
http://www.aflcio.org/mediacen...
And right on cue, the Oxymoron decides to spread more hatred and propaganda, by blaming government not Corporate America or the bankers for the problems workers face:

Now, as many of you that have followed my musings may be aware, I am an admirer of Richard Trumka. Speeches like this one should show everyone why. The forces of the "robber barons" are still very alive and still seek to rape the American worker. They care little about anything but protecting their own profits and killing the American dream for 98% of us all while turning worker against worker in a never-ending game of "ring around the rosy".
With the well-funded enemies of progress for all Americans firing up the weak-minded to oppose their own interests so the greediest and least patriotic among us can continue to rob our country blind only one solution is left for Progressives, working men and women, and intellectuals. We must band together and DEMAND that America is once again the land of the free and the home of the brave instead of the home of a cutthroat, laissez-faire society we escaped in the New World.
We have been far too quiet and complacent during the tea-bag era of ignorant misled souls marching against themselves and all of us. We simply must stand together and fight as hard as we are being fought against by the forces of hatred whose sorry asses are covered because they are rich and could care less how many people get sick or die as long as they can hoard the money amongst themselves. The time has come for us all to stand up and stand together and fight for the ideals our country was founded on before we all must watch them be relegated to the history books as the world's beacon of freedom and liberty is smashed to bits in the name of Corporate profits, Greed and hatred.
Now is the time for all patriots to come to the aid of our country because our very way of life is threatened with extinction by the same forces of cruel greed that breed ignorance and steal away the liberties our people have long fought to uphold. Either we stand now and fight back, or the ideal that was America will die a slow, painfully tortured death.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)

Let The Sun Shine In......

Friday, April 2, 2010

Fox Fake News.....

What else is new?

BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
by Jeffrey Joseph

Many have remarked on FOX's tendency to promote a set narrative in lieu of actually reporting on the news. Nonetheless, few might have suspected that the network's zeal for their own narrative would have so plainly led to false implications as when FOX reported a joke as straight news and made efforts to falsely bolster Sarah Palin's new special in ways that have already backfired.

Ever willing to take a jab at global warming activists, FOX presented as news an article about Professor James Schneider, a "famed global warming activist," freezing to death in the Antarctic while trying to do research on the melting of ice sheets as a consequence of global warming. Without specifically commenting on the irony, the FOX presentation included an excerpt from Linda Schneider, James' wife, saying, "He kept talking about when they 'get down to chili,' and I thought they were talking about the order in which they would consume their food supplies." Strangely, the activist's wife, according to the piece, thought he was heading to Greenland rather than the Antarctica on the other side of the globe and misinterpreted Chile, the nation, for chili.

Of course, the whole article was a hoax. The post originally appeared in 2006 on ecoEnquirer.com, to which FOX Nation linked in the article it presented. However, the posters on FOX failed to recognize the website's history of satire. Posted too early to even promote as an April Fool's Day joke, FOX has since taken the article down, but not without already putting into serious question the validity of the "news" site.

The cable network hardly fared better. In building up Sarah Palin's debut special, FOX aired promos suggesting Palin would feature stories from stars such as LL Cool J, Toby Keith, and GE Executive Jack Welch. From the outset, the show seemed altogether suspicious since GE operates MSNBC, politically counter to the entire network, but the promotions left the implication that Palin would have a new interview with Welch and the others.

Welch turned out to be the least of Palin's concerns. LL Cool J publicly took umbrage with the suggestion he would make an appearance on the show. He has now famously tweeted, "Fox lifted an old interview I gave in 2008 to someone else & are misrepresenting to the public in order to promote Sarah Palins Show. WOW." In turn, FOX scrambled onto the offensive, removing him from the show and representing the move as if the star "does not want to be associated with a program that could serve as an inspiration to others." To ensure LL Cool J felt FOX's hostility, it concluded with a back-handed compliment in choosing to "wish him the best with his fledgling acting career," this despite the fact that the star has appeared in movies and television for over twenty years. Of course, the sender proved too cowardly to attach a name to the denigrating remarks.

With some forethought, FOX may have anticipated LL Cool J's incredulity at his appearance in Palin's promos, but Toby Keith's parallel publicly voiced surprise likely comes as a bit more of a shock. As related by Keith's publicist, Elaine Schock, "Toby was not asked to participate, nor has he ever done an interview with Sarah Palin." FOX has not yet issued another stinging response to Keith's statement as it did with LL Cool J. Nor has FOX thus far suggested it would remove Keith's portions from the show, also apparently from a long-past interview that did not involve Palin. What it has illustrated, though, was a willingness to promote Sarah Palin using celebrities who had given the network no assent to the promotions. Fortunately, said celebrities had enough fortitude to push back on FOX's implications that Palin could acquire the star guests and proven [PROVES?] that Palin's talent suffices only to present a hodgepodge of old videos rather than bringing anything new to her audience.

On this April Fool's Day, FOX presents a series of jokes, albeit unintentionally. From its laughable standards of journalism in presenting satire as news to propping up Palin as a valid contributor to the national discourse then recognizing she can hardly showcase others' interviews without widespread ridicule, it would be hard to say if the joke is more on FOX or its viewers. Since the coverage lacks a holiday to be bereft of integrity, though, FOX's network ends up more dangerous than hilarious for its dedicated viewers. In turn, viewers should demand that FOX stop continually misinforming its audience, intentionally and otherwise -- and in the meantime, choose to Turn Off FOX.

Please send in tips and success stories to turnofffox@gmail.com, look out for us on Twitter @turnofffox, and join us at BuzzFlash in the Campaign to Turn Off FOX News. And please forward this article to a friend. You can drive the message home by obtaining a Turn Off FOX Bumper Sticker. Just Click Here.


Originally posted at Turn Off FOX.

Let The Sun Shine In......

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Fox, Insists On Stoking More Threats of Violence if not Violence.

BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
by Jeffrey Joseph

Now that the healthcare reform debate appears mostly over and FOX's campaign against it mostly lost, some might have expected the nation to move on to the next great issue. 

Unfortunately, so much of the vitriolic rhetoric that surrounded the reform bill appears to have incited violence after the bill's passage. In response, many FOX personalities have made deplorable attempts to excuse the actions much of their own coverage helped produce.

The threats against Democratic lawmakers have increased in number and ferocity to the point where the FBI has had to investigate threats and attacks against them. Now even GOP Rep. Eric Cantor claimed in a relatively terse press conference that he, too, has received similar threats including a bullet through one of his campaign offices. As often noted by media analysts, much of the blame for the hyperbolic rhetoric goes right to FOX news. When FOX boasts of a personality such as Glenn Beck who is willing to write off political opponents as "Marxists," analysts have a hard time laying much of the blame on people outside the FOX network.

Unsurprisingly, FOX has made several efforts to diminish the severity of the attacks. Steve Doocy referenced the attacks against Democrats and suggested with a smile that it resulted from people who "maybe...didn't want this bill." The Fox & Friends hosts did speak out against violence, but illustrating an inability to grasp the severity of the attacks, Gretchen Carlson compared them to "a kid who acts up at a birthday party."

More offensive than failure to comprehend the serious nature of the violence was the effort to blame the Democrats for the violence perpetrated against them. Beck accepted a call from a listener suggesting the Democrats walked through the Tea Party protesters to intentionally provoke the crowd for political purposes. In fact, Beck took it a step further and said, "I can guarantee you they walked out and said, 'What the hell do you have to do to these people to get them to kill us?' I swear to you!"

Karl Rove failed to go so far as to say Democrats willfully manipulated opponents into violence against them initially, but he did the next best thing -- accusing Democrats of using the attacks for political purposes and only encouraging more. Rove expressed sympathy for those subjected to potential violence, but he continued, "I don't think, however, it is useful for those in a position of authority to fan the flames and to try and draw attention to these because it simply is going to encourage copycats." By that logic, no one should mention the attacks, even to condemn them, and anyone who becomes a victim would only have themselves to blame. Since so many of those attacked had been, up to that point, people politically opposed to Rove, taking such a ridiculous stance probably made sense to him. Ironically, Cantor echoed Rove's sentiments about not publicizing the violence while simultaneously publicizing the violence at his press conference where he told the nation about the violence reaching his own office.

The closest FOX has come to having a host hold accountable some of those responsible for inciting the violence came in the form of Shepard Smith's interview with Republican National Committee Chair Michael Steele. Smith laudably chided Steele for responding to questions about the Republicans' approach to healthcare reform with talking points and went on to ask Steele, "I want to talk about the message a little bit. Leader Boehner called this 'Armageddon.' You've talked about a 'loss of freedoms.' The bill, said one Republican Congressman from Texas we now know, it's a baby-killer if we're to believe what he says about it today. Is this rhetoric helpful in these times in this nation? And if not, how might it be changed to where both sides could make their points without leaving a level of division that...is not good for this country?" Steele tried to explain that it was what "average folks out there are saying around the kitchen table." Smith handily replied, "Armageddon? Seriously?"
Smith had a valid point in suggesting that the leaders of the GOP had a lot to do with the rhetoric. Besides talk of Armageddon, Minority Leader Boehner also said of Rep. Steve Driehaus, a Democrat, that if he considered voting for healthcare reform, "He may be a dead man. He can’t go home to the west side of Cincinnati." Smith's main shortfall comes from failing to similarly take his FOX colleagues to task. Preceding his questioning of Steele, Smith read a piece from noted conservative columnist David Frum describing healthcare reform passage as the GOP Waterloo. Another telling comment from Frum came in his explaining the association between FOX and the GOP when he said, "Republicans originally thought that FOX worked for us, and now we are discovering we work for FOX." If, as Smith suggests, the GOP shares much of the blame for the vitriol in politics today, then FOX also carries much of, if not the bulk of, the same blame.

Violence against any politician in the U.S., regardless of political leaning, deserves condemnation. FOX's refusal to accept some of the responsibility for the rhetoric it fostered and the real violence that has apparently spilled over to both sides as a consequence seems ignorant. Trying to blame the Democrats for it by belittling the severity of the issue and the impulse to speak out against it or for insidiously willing it upon themselves, seems shamelessly self-serving. People should turn away from the violence and vitriol until people like Smith turn to the entire network for accountability -- and choose to Turn Off FOX.

Please send in tips and success stories to turnofffox@gmail.com, look out for us on Twitter @turnofffox, and join us at BuzzFlash in the Campaign to Turn Off FOX News. And please forward this article to a friend. You can drive the message home by obtaining a Turn Off FOX Bumper Sticker. Just Click Here.
Originally posted at Turn Off FOX.


Let The Sun Shine In......

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Old Dick The Vice Calls Obama A Traitor



Saw Matthews' head damned near explode about this last night. Discussing the topic were Ron Reagan and Ron Christie. Reagan almost took Christie's head off when he alluded to Ron's father and torture in the same breath. Good on you, Ron Jr! 


In case the name doesn't ring a bell (or cause nausea), Christie is a very odd-looking, strange-thinking man who regularly shows up regularly on Cable Opinion TeeVee to defend "all-things-Cheney." I imagine he would defend murder if Cheney had a hand in it. Actually, I think he may have defended murder, since the torture policy which was and is defended, ad nauseum, by Cheney has, in fact, killed several people. 


By saying that Obama was giving aid and comfort to "the enemy" by allowing the current DOJ to prosecute KSM in New York, Cheney is clearly accusing Obama of treason. According to the constitution, which barely defines treason, aiding and abetting is treasonous.  


 http://www.newshounds.us/2009/12/09/dick_cheney_on_hannity_sudden_respect_for_the_constitution.php


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. PELICAN BLOGS HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR ARE PELICAN BLOGS ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.


"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON THIS BLOG MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Let The Sun Shine In......

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Stewert Rips Faux Noise A New One

 But never fear, all will be forgotten in the next 5 minutes because they all apologized and everything will get back to normal, forthwith. We all know what "normal" means at Fox.


As much as we all might value BuzzFlash, a picture, or in this case a videotape, is worth a thousand words.

BuzzFlash has launched "a get America to Turn Off FOX" campaign -- and other online sites have gathered tens of thousands of names opposed to FOX. And several sites, including Media Matters, have regularly documented FOX's deceitful and dishonest coverage.

But, as we all know,  it takes Jon Stewart, with his visual images proving his case, to really erode FOX's credibility and undercut the influence of the FOX brand, which we all know is unfair and unbalanced but for some reason the corporate mainstream media defends.  In fact, the MSM scurried to FOX's defense when the White House correctly noted that the very same corporate "journalists" in D.C. and NY often take their cues from phony FOX coverage.

So, it was with hearfelt thanks that we saw Stewart bring FOX to their knees, actually forcing them to admit that they had used footage from a spring Teabagger rally to make Michele Bachmann's latest freak show gathering in D.C. appear much, much larger than it was.

What allows Stewart to be so devastating to FOX is that he assembles clips that would be damning in court, as they are in the court of public opinion. And these are reports aired on FOX, so how can they accuse their own reporting of being manipulative, incendiary and false?

So it was that after Stewart aired the kind of old Soviet Union style FOX propaganda "news" clip to pump up Bachmann and the Teabaggers, Hannity was forced into the rarest of FOX admissions: Stewart was right -- he had caught them in the act that they so often commit and rolled the tape to prove it.

According to a late November 11th New York Times Internet story, Hannity confessed on Wednesday night to “an inadvertent mistake":

On his show on the Fox News Channel Wednesday night, Sean Hannity admitted to using scenes from a different rally to illustrate a report on a health care protest last week....
Wednesday night Mr. Hannity admitted that “we screwed up” in using the “incorrect video.” He called it “an inadvertent mistake.”
Mr. Hannity did not address specifically how the mistake came to be made but he said somewhat ruefully: “It pains me to say: Jon Stewart was right.”

The cumulative, well-documented charges of FOX's manipulation and creation of partisan stories -- even promoting, sponsoring, and covering Teabagger events as if FOX were one and the same with the barbarians at the gates -- has started to take a toll on the FOX brand.

I've never seen them this defensive before. Even right wing media baron Rupert Murdoch found himself condoning Glenn Beck calling President Obama a racist, while denying that anyone on FOX News compared Obama to Stalin, which they are documented as doing. That ended up with a Murdoch spokesperson forced to "clarify" that Murdoch really didn't say what he said. Got it?

American corporations depend on what is called "brand identity." FOX has -- by being ubiquitous, using flashy television techology and graphics, and reinforcing a warped world view to a small segment of the American population -- has managed to get the mainstream media to regard it as a legitimate news channel.

Time will tell, but it appears the cumulative exposures of the fraud that is FOX News are starting to impact the "brand identity" of "fair and balanced." And if it loses its luster of credibility among corporate news networks, its influence will be considerably diminished.

And while others have laid the groundwork (don't forget to join the BuzzFlash "Get America to Turn Off FOX Brigade") Jon Stewart has the most impact because he airs the video proof, and some 70% of Americans get their news from television.

Jon Stewart, as Will Bunch of the Philadelphia Daily News notes, is doing the investigating and exposing that the corporate media should be doing. And you have to add that Stewart has growing stature as a debunker of media charlatans -- and the mainstream media watches him.

FOX will no doubt be hiring Lou Dobbs, now departing CNN for a more compatible venue.

If that's the case, Dobbs may be the right wing nut job tonnage that tips FOX "News" irreversibly into a tarnished "brand name," with its credibility sinking ever lower.

Whatever happens with Dobbs, the growing defensiveness and tarnishing of FOX will be in no small part due to the visual -- and witty -- evidence aired by Jon Stewart -- backed by an army of Internet researchers and campaigns.

BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG



IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. PELICAN BLOGS HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR ARE PELICAN BLOGS ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.


"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON THIS BLOG MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Let The Sun Shine In......

Friday, November 6, 2009

Glenny and His Little Red Phone

A tale for children of all ages:

Thomas Frank asserts Beck's red phone "really symbolizes a new kind of ignorance"

http://mediamatters.org/items/200911040001

From Frank's November 3 Wall Street Journal column:
Glenn Beck, the popular Fox News host, has a red telephone on his desk that never seems to ring. Every now and then, in a moment of acute frustration, he will pick it up and give the camera his trademark pleading-puppy look.
(Does that "look" make anyone else think of a puppy, pleading or otherwise? I love puppies. I would never think of harming a puppy or even wishing that harm would come his way. As a matter of fact, I would rescue every puppy I see,  if I could make his or her life better. This man, Beck,  does not remind me of a puppy, no matter his expression. I don't care what happens to him, I just wish it didn't have to happen on live television.) 

What Mr. Beck wants to hear from the phone are answers, and he wants to hear them from the highest authority in the land: the phone, he says, is "a dedicated line right to the White House." And when Mr. Beck gets things wrong, he wants his antagonists on Pennsylvania Avenue to correct him. But "They don't call. They're not going to call."

(Of course not. Does anyone relish the idea of calling crazy Aunt Matilda at the local macadamia ranch. In all seriousness, why on earth would anyone expect that the White House would publicly call someone who a majority of people believe is either demented or a damn good actor.)

Consider a few of the other grand assertions tossed out by the panic-peddling host last week: that the cause of last year's financial crisis was pressure exerted by Acorn and "the people in Washington" on otherwise-reluctant mortgage lenders; that the cause of the inflation of the 1970s was President Jimmy Carter's quest for a "socialist utopia."

(Say what? Damn! I can't even follow that "logic," having actually lived though the period he mentions in a fairly conscious state.)
These are postulates that it is only possible to believe after you have utterly closed yourself off to conventional ways of knowing, after you have decided that the reporting and analysis and scholarship on these subjects are not worth reading, and that you will choose ideological fairy tales over reality until the day a magical phone call comes from on high.

  
What Mr. Beck's silent phone really symbolizes is a new kind of ignorance, a coming high-tech dark age in which people can choose to blow off professional standards of inquiry; in which they can wall themselves off with cable TV and friendly Web sites, dismiss what displeases as liberal bias, and demand that any contrary view be transmitted to them via telephone call from the president himself.

Yep, and this is no laughing matter, unlike Mr. Beck is, from time to time. It will be interesting, indeed, to see how America deals with containing two entirely different realities. I certainly hope that the powers-that-be do not over-react and try to start controlling everything, especially the Internet. No doubt, this is a dangerous time in this country and, let's face it, the world-at-large is not all that safe. Not only does Beck's phone represent a new kind of "chosen" ignorance, but an ignorant, narcissistic sense of entitlement that, I'm afraid, doesn't stop with Beck. 


Why not let Mr. Beck and his viewers have their fun? Because ideas have consequences. Maybe, as many believe, Glenn Beck is indeed the future of the conservative movement. From tea parties to town-hall meetings, thousands are signing up and fitting themselves out with their very own hotline to nowhere.

I have yet to figure out what Beck's ideas are. Of course, I must admit that I cannot watch much of his shtick. From what I have been able to deduce; Acorn is responsible for every bad thing that has happened to the country since Blacks got the vote, or something like that. Barack Obama is connected to Acorn somehow....Acorn in Indonesia? . He had it all on a magnetic board one day when I happened by. That board was such a hideous mess by the time I tuned in, I could not make heads or tails of it. Is this what the guy's brain looks like on a Pet Scan, I wondered?

From what I can tell, his ideology goes something like this: All things Democratic are evil, corrupt and dark (one can take that last one anyway one wants and they will be correct). If God, itself, spoke from the heavens and, in a booming voice heard round the world, anointed Obama has his sacred messenger, Beck would declare him the anti-christ and the battle would be joined for Armageddon. Beck has no sense of history at all from what I can tell, not unlike the mouthpieces of the last administration.

He seems to believe that Democrats are the spiritual sons and daughters of Stalin and Lenin. He seems to not know what socialism, communism and Marxism are, let alone understand the role of authoritarianism in some of the greatest and most damaging crack-ups in history. Does he not understand that Stalin no more represented what Marx had in mind than Beck, himself, represents what any rational person means by "fair and balanced." or  just balanced, for that matter.

I imagine that he is a huge fan of unfettered capitalism since it is this system which allows him to be paid a huge salary to seemingly have a slow psychic meltdown on Teevee for everyone to see. Hey, reality teevee sells and it's cheap to produce. Old Rupert knows what sells. It's all to be expected in anything-for-a-buck America.


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. PELICAN BLOGS HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR ARE PELICAN BLOGS ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.


"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON THIS BLOG MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Let The Sun Shine In......

Sunday, October 25, 2009

Fox News Ignores Tea Party protest of MSM

Media Matters has the whole story on this silly business.

What I want to know is where were the protests of the MSM when they helped the Bush White House lie us into the Iraq war, an illegal war by anyone's definition, a war which in large part led us into the economic nightmare in which we find ourselves.

No president can run two wars off a credit card, never allowing the people to see how much these ill-advised, if not criminal, wars were costing. The Bush administration even had a policy of not allowing the caskets of the fallen to be seen on television, let alone the dollar amount in the cost of the wars.

The only thing that was obvious was the cost to Americas reputation and credibility.

Following criticism of being an "arm" of the GOP, Fox News aired no live coverage of Oct. 17 media "malpractice" tea party

http://mediamatters.org/items/200910190001

Following White House communications director Anita Dunn's recent critique of Fox News serving as an "arm" of the Republican Party, Fox News did not devote any live coverage to what it had previously referred to as the October 17 "tea part[y]" protests by Operation: Can You Hear Us Now?, an organization that planned "to show the MSM [mainstream media] that we as the American Public are absolutely fed up with their journalistic malpractice." By contrast, Fox News devoted significant promotion and live coverage of the April 15 tax day tea party and the September 12 "March on Washington."

On October 17, Fox News aired no live coverage of media protests

Operation: Can You Hear Us Now? organized October 17 protests against "journalistic malpractice." According to the Frequently Asked Questions page of the Operation: Can You Hear Us Now? website, the protests were a "nationwide event meant to show the MSM that we as the American Public are absolutely fed up with their journalistic malpractice."


Fox News did not cover "Tea Parties Marching on Media Outlets" live on October 17. According to a Media Matters for America review of Fox News' programming on October 17, the network did not report live on the media protests that day. While Fox News devoted no on-air coverage to the protests that day, FoxNews.com ran an October 17 article headlined, "Tea Partiers Take Aim at Major Media Outlets." The article stated that the "[t]he 'tea party' movement is back" and reported that "[t]he 'Can You Hear Us Now' rallies are planned for Saturday in front of NBC studios in Burbank, CNN in Atlanta and affiliate stations of NBC, ABC and CBS across the nation."

Fox News had previously promoted October 17 "tea parties" protesting "journalistic malpractice"

:

IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. PELICAN BLOGS HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR ARE PELICAN BLOGS ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.


"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON THIS BLOG MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Let The Sun Shine In......

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Fox News viewers overwhelmingly misinformed about health care reform proposals.

Does this come as a surprise to anyone?

When hot civil war breaks out in this country these idiots will have only themselves to blame. 
I know we will be blaming them!


graphic

Last night, NBC News and the Wall Street Journal released a poll showing that “all the misinformation out there” about health care reform proposals in Congress is taking root with many Americans. For instance, 45 percent believe the false claim that legislation includes “death panels” while 55 percent believe the false claimviewers of Fox News are disproportionately misinformed: that coverage will be extended to illegal immigrants. MSNBC’s First Read notes that self-identified

Here’s another way to look at the misinformation: In our poll, 72% of self-identified FOX News viewers believe the health-care plan will give coverage to illegal immigrants, 79% of them say it will lead to a government takeover, 69% think that it will use taxpayer dollars to pay for abortions, and 75% believe that it will allow the government to make decisions about when to stop providing care for the elderly.


But it would be incorrect to suggest that this is ONLY coming from conservative viewers who tune in to FOX. In fact, 41% of CNN/MSNBC viewers believe the misinformation about illegal immigrants, 39% believe the government takeover stuff, 40% believe the abortion misperception, and 30% believe the stuff about pulling the plug on grandma. What’s more, a good chunk of folks who get their news from broadcast TV (NBC, ABC, CBS) believe these things, too. This is about credible messengers using the media to get some of this misinformation out there, not as much about the filter itself. These numbers should worry Democratic operatives, as well as the news media that have been covering this story.


As ThinkProgress has pointed out, Fox News regularly distorts the truth about health care reform. Last week, Media Matters found that over a two day period opponents of health care reform outnumbered supporters by a 6-to-1 margin on Fox.
I guess we will get what we deserve!


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. PELICAN BLOGS HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR ARE PELICAN BLOGS ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.


"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON THIS BLOG MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Let The Sun Shine In......

Saturday, August 1, 2009

GE Puts the Lid on Olbermann's Scathing Attacks on O'Reilly

Little Billy Can't Take As Good As He Gives. 



By Mark Karlin

For nearly 10 years, BuzzFlash has asked its readers for financial support because it doesn't accept advertising.


Now Keith Olbermann knows why.


In a deal between the head of GE (the owner of MSNBC) and Murdoch's FOX News reported in The New York Times, it was agreed that Olbermann would back off his chronic lacerating caricatures of Bill O'Reilly (although it can still be expected that he will go after O'Reilly and FOX, but much less frequently).


In return, FOX and O'Reilly, in particular, will stop attacking the business dealings of GE.  Are you getting the picture of how even MSNBC is affected by big corporate ownership?


A key indicator of what was threatening GE is buried in The New York Times article about the "peace agreement" (which amounts to a decrease in virulent exchanges between O'Reilly and Olbermann). Here are two points worthy of note to indicate that MSNBC talent may be kept on a shorter leash than progressive followers had hoped for:
The reconciliation — not acknowledged by the parties until now — showcased how a personal and commercial battle between two men could create real consequences for their parent corporations. A G.E. shareholders’ meeting, for instance, was overrun by critics of MSNBC (and one of Mr. O’Reilly’s producers) last April....
In late 2007, Mr. O’Reilly had a young producer, Jesse Watters, ambush Mr. Immelt and ask about G.E.’s business in Iran, which is legal, and which includes sales of energy and medical technology. G.E. says it no longer does business in Iran.
Mr. O’Reilly continued to pour pressure on its corporate leaders, even saying on one program last year that “If my child were killed in Iraq, I would blame the likes of Jeffrey Immelt.” The resulting e-mail to G.E. from Mr. O’Reilly’s viewers was scathing.


Like most of the feuds between the right wing media echo chamber and progressive critics, the publicity surrounding O'Reilly-Olbermann slugfest helped the ratings of both programs.


But when FOX started to go after the business dealings of the parent company of MSNBC, GE, television ratings took a second place to corporate interests.


This is just another example of why BuzzFlash relies only on its readers for financially supporting its progressive news and commentary.


BuzzFlash developed a closed-circle media model for progressives: buy progressive premiums that help support a progressive economy, upstart new generation companies that heal the world, and celebrate progressive culture.  In turn, net proceeds finance the news, commentary and advocacy of BuzzFlash. (We will be launching advocacy initiatives in the coming months that rely on grassroots involvement in social change, not petitions to Washington, D.C.)


BuzzFlash loves Keith Olbermann, but in the end he's an employee of GE, and MSNBC is dispensible to them.  They'll milk the progressive wave as long as it doesn't really threaten the entrenched status quo. In the end, their primary interests as a corporation include going nuclear, literally.  GE isn't going to let Keith or Rachel or Ed get in the way of that.


It's all just business to GE and Rupert Murdoch.  GE isn't about to slice its own throat.


Just remember that.


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. PELICAN BLOGS HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR ARE PELICAN BLOGS ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.


"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON THIS BLOG MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Let The Sun Shine In......

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Fox Reporter Contradicts Fox:

 DHS Report On Right Wing Was ‘Requested By The Bush Administration’

Yesterday, a Department of Homeland Security report about the rising radicalization of “rightwing extremists” was leaked. The right wing was immediately incensed, viewing the report on radical “extremists” as an attack on “conservatives.” MSNBC host Joe Scarborough, for example, tried to suggest it was a report about Republican “loyalists.”

However, this morning, Fox News’s Catherine Herridge revealed that the report, along with an earlier report on radicalized left-wing groups, was actually “requested by the Bush administration” but not completed until recently:
HERRIDGE: Well this is an element of the story which has largely gone unreported. One looks at right-wing groups, as you mentioned. And a second is on left-wing groups. Significantly, both were requested by the Bush administration but not finished until President Bush left office.
Herridge’s reporting undermines her network’s own “reporting” over the past 24 hours. Since news of the DHS assessment broke yesterday, Fox anchors and guests have been seizing upon the report as evidence that the administration is trying to intimidate tea party goers or “stifle speech”:
– ANDREA TANTAROS: It’s free speech and the Obama administration is trying to shut it down.

– JAY ALAN SEKULOW: The Obama administration here under Department of Homeland Security has allowed a new regime to come into place that basically says this: Our focus is going to be on the right-wing groups.

– SEAN HANNITY: What do you think of that interpretation, especially coming from a guy that started his political career in the home of an unrepentant terrorist who bombed the Pentagon and capital and sat in Reverend Wright’s church for 20 years?


– DANA PERINO: If Bush had done that we would be having a very different conversation. It wouldn’t have taken a week to find it out. There would have been a special prosecutor. We would have had to come out and apologize.
Watch a compilation, ending with Herridge’s report:



To recap, the Obama administration was apparently following the lead of the Bush Homeland Security Department in assessing the very real threat of violent right-wing extremism.

Indeed, Bush appointees such as FBI Director Robert Mueller have acknowledged the threat of right-wing extremism multiple times.

Of course, we can always trust Fox News to jump to conclusions before fully weighing the facts.


Let The Sun Shine In......

Glenn Becks Slide Into Insanity

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Monday, February 23, 2009

Fox News Justifies A Coming Civil War In the U.S.

Admittedly, we have suggested that the U.S. has been in a cold civil war for decades and that governance and mean-spirited political media, during the past decade in particular, has made the divisions in this country so deep and broad that a hot civil war is not out of the realm of possibility.

It is one of the saddest thoughts I, personally, have had in a very long time.

However, it was not a financial meltdown, nationwide let alone global, or global that caused the last civil war in the U.S.. It was racism and one region's fear of a financial meltdown if slavery was outlawed in the Western states. That region was the old South.

Our parents/grandparents did not square off against each other during the Great Depression. Instead, Americans pulled together and, with the help of great leadership, rebuilt the U.S. as a more modernized, compassionate nation.

We have come upon another such time, except this time our situation if far worse.

We all know how much easier it is to spend money than it is to earn it, especially when the guys at the top are robbing the rest of us blind. The officers of big business has had a drunken bash for over 8 long years and nothing has been said or done to stop it by the last administration. Small investors and workers have gotten the shaft over and over while corporate officers have walked away with billions. Corporations have moved jobs off-shore and their official corporate offices into mail boxes in countries known to be tax shelters.

Billions of dollars have simply been lost by the DOD in Iraq. No one can account for any of it. Then there were the no-bid contracts that went to Bush/Cheney cronies overseas and in disaster areas at home, like New Orleans and the northern Gulf Coast for example.

Still, Republicans, both in office and on radio and teevee, are doing all in their power to drive wedges between Americans just when we need cooperation, charitable action and compassion.

Some of us are still playing dangerous political games in this dire time for our country, not to mention the rest of the world. If violence breaks out in this country, people like Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh, most of the comedians at Faux Noise and others who use our radio airwaves to stir hatred and feelings of victimization among their followers will have only themselves to blame...and believe me, we will blame them!

They just do not seem to understand that the "times, they are changin'.

People from every region of this country are sick and tired of voodoo economics, corruption and cronyism. We are all more and more aware of the super over-class and we have had about all we can take of ostentatious wealth and people who make more in one year than most of us could spend in a life-time while running their businesses off a cliff and taking the American economy along with them.

If, indeed, the people of this nation are leaning left, seeing socialism as not all that bad at times and in certain sectors of the economy, it is because they had a terrifying look into the abyss of fascism and they did not like what they saw.


FOX News Suggests America is Doomed, Civil War May Be Justified

The America lovers at FOX News sure have a funny way of showing their esteem sometimes. Take, for example, Glenn Beck's February 20, 2009 show in which he did his darnedest to scare viewers into thinking that the country is on the road to Apocalypse. In a paranoid fantasy spun out over several segments, Beck and a series of guests set forth a number of dire “worst-case scenarios” for the United States in 2014. During each segment, Beck gave viewers the disclaimer that the apocalyptic visions he and his guests presented were not predictions of what would happen but merely what could happen. And yet Beck and his guests spoke as though the doomsday scenarios, including civil war, were a likelihood, if not a fait accompli. With video.

In “Worst-Case Scenario” No. 1, Beck and his experts imagined the impact of a complete financial meltdown. In this scenario, as Beck described it, all the banks were nationalized, the Dow was at 2800, unemployment at 12%, the commericial real estate market collapsed, the USA's credit rating was downgraded and government and unions control most businesses.

It was a given to the host and both guests that the nationalized banks would be part of this picture instead of, say, helping to avert such a catastrophe. Ditto for unions “controlling” most business.

Guest Gerald Celente, a “trends forecaster,” made it clear he thought the situation was less a “what if” and more a what will be. “New York City looks like Mexico City,” he asserted in the present tense, where anyone who appears to have money is a target for kidnapping.

The other guest, Stephen Moore, of the Wall Street Journal, also segued from “then” to “now.” “You don't have to think about these wild 'buts.' We've seen this happen to other countries... all consumed by government, all do-goodism that led to the decline of their civilizations,” he said, naming Mexico, Bolivia, Argentina Zimbabwe and Russia as examples.

Moore also warned that even if the government pays out Social Security benefits, the dollars may be worthless due to hyper-inflation.

Scenario No. 2: Global civil unrest

The banner on the screen read: “Beck's War Room experts imagine what would happen if the U.S. no longer played world policeman.”

In this scenario, Mexico has been taken over by narco-gangs; oil and gas pipelines have been “targeted and destroyed;” tourism “non-existant;” 50 million people are unemployed and there are “riots in the streets.”

Again, the guests bumped up “maybe” to “likely.” Former CIA officer Bob Baer described the “probability” scenarios as “prolonged depression,” and warned of trouble with Iran. According to Baer, the Gulf countries would suffer and Iran therefore would “move into the Gulf and take it. We have a hostile regime in control of our resources. That is not that far away (my emphasis).”

With Netanyahu now in power in Israel, Baer said (speaking about the present) that the Pentagon estimates the chances of war in the Middle East are likely 55%.

Beck complained that “what's happening” in the Middle East is also tied in with Europe. “Europe, itself, is teetering with Muslim extremists, as well (Beck seemed to be referring to the present). How does the world stand without America standing there and being prepared to deal with it?”

Novelist and former member of the Department of Homeland Security Brad Thor (who once advocated installing jailed former Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega in Iraq as a solution to the war there) said that it would be just like when a teacher leaves the classroom. “A lot of these people go wild and I'm talking in particular in the Muslim world.”

Worst-Case Scenario 3 was “anger and discontent at home.” What they meant was gangs and civil war.

The tax rate would be “80, 90, perhaps even 95%... just to pay for what we've already spent money on,” said Moore. Celente predicted violent tax revolts. “The cities are gonna look like Dodge City. They're gonna be uncontrollable. You're gonna have gangs in control, motorcycle maurauders... just like Mexico.”

Note the lack of the word “may” or “might” or “possibly.”

The result, according to the experts, would be a rise of “bubba” militias. CSM Tim Strong (ret) predicted that the government would start arresting the good guys who were trying to protect their property. He said (using words of certainty), “The problem you have, Glenn, is you've got people that are gonna do the right thing, that truly protect the interests of the United States, to include their own, but they're the ones that are gonna be apprehended for it because they did something to somebody that was not in compliance with what the US government – 'cause it's easy to arrest a guy who's gonna be orderly and conduct himself accordingly because that's what our society breeds.” He predicted that “bubbas” would hunker down and start being anti-government as a result.

Beck dropped his “just wild and crazy brainstorming” pretense. With his trademark “golly gee” astonishment, he said average people “feel that the government – or they will in this scenario, and I think we're on this road (my emphasis) – the government has betrayed the Constitution and so they will see themselves as people who are standing up for the Constitution... How long do we have before this becomes a crazy real scenario? ...This is a scenario that would tear this country apart and, and, and, and spiral us into something that maybe we have never even seen before, including the Civil War.”

Retired CIA analyst Michael Scheuer even suggested that he approved of any ensuing Civil War. “I don't think the founders ever considered that there would be a tyranny of incompetence but I think that's what we're facing. And ultimately, that's the right of the American.”

As Glenn Greenwald noted in his excellent discussion of this show, “If someone like (Charles Johnson of Little Green Footballs and Pajamas Media) thinks that FOX News is being irresponsibly, even dangerously inflammatory, then that's a pretty compelling sign of how far over the line they actually are."

Amen, Greenwald! I couldn't have said it better myself.

Let The Sun Shine In......