Showing posts with label Independent Light. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Independent Light. Show all posts

Friday, January 22, 2010

Remember These Five Names....

More Importantly, Remember the Names of The Corporate Jackasses who buy our government. 


Making a list a checking it twice.....



By Jim Hightower

Last September, I wrote The Hightower Lowdown about how the Roberts' Court could throw out over 100 years of campaign finance law.

Remember their names: Alito, Kennedy, Roberts, Scalia, and Thomas.

Yesterday, from within the dark isolation of the Supreme Court, these five men pulled off a black-robed coup against the American people's democratic authority. In an unprecedented perversion of judicial power, this court cabal has decreed that corporations have a free-speech "right" to dip into their corporate coffers and spend unlimited sums of money to elect or defeat candidates of their choosing.

Corporate interests already had too much money power over our political system.

No other group in America comes anywhere near the spending clout that this relatively small clutch of wealthy special interests wields over our elections and government. So it's ludicrous for anyone – much less Supreme Court judges – to argue that the corporate voice is a victim of political "censorship." This is not merely judicial activism, it is judicial radicalism.

Thomas Jefferson warned about the dangerous rise of corporate power, declaring that must "crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations." Today, I'm sure that founding patriots like Jefferson are not simply spinning in their graves at the Supreme Court's surrender to this aristocracy – they're trying to claw their way out of their graves to throttle all five of the traitors.

We MUST fight back. Many good groups are working on this issue, and we all have to get involved to fight against this corporate take over of our political system. Public Citizen has a petition we can sign. Common Cause is asking us to contact our congresspersons and make sure they have signed on to the Fair Elections Now Act. I mentioned other good groups that are working on this issue. Get in touch with them. Let's fight the good fight... and win! Onward!


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. PELICAN BLOGS HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR ARE PELICAN BLOGS ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.


"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON THIS BLOG MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Let The Light Shine In....

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Thankful Progressives

With some of my reasons for thankfulness added in dark red....



THANKSGIVING

27 Reasons To Give Thanks


We're thankful President Obama is thinking long and hard about committing more troops and money to Afghanistan.

(and I will whole-heartedly support a huge increase in troops under the following conditions: 1) There is a policy regarding our involvement in Afghanistan and what victory would look like; how does Obama and his war team define it. Part of that policy had better say whether or not we have (or ever had, for that matter) a policy to capture or kill the people whom, we are told, are responsible for the worst attacks on American soil since the war of 1812 and I'm not talking about KSM. OBL and the crazy Egyptian corn-ball who speaks for him these days. The policy must also include an exit strategy and a time-line created in conjunction with our allies. The attacks on 9/11/01 affected the whole world, not just Americans. However, what we would beg Obama not to do is to commit just enough troops to keep the war going so the Goopers won't call him a wimp but not enough to accomplish the only goals ever articulated to the American people and "our" Congress; to get the guys who conspired to hit us on 9/11, the elimination of Al Qaeda, world wide.)

We're thankful President Bush feels liberated now.


(I'm not so sure I feel that way. Heaven only knows what kind of nightmarish crimes the next administration will feel comfortable committing since nothing happened to Bush or to Cheney or to any of their brother trolls and murderers! Trust me, the failure to bring to justice the war criminals who committed crimes against the constitution and, therefore, against the people of the U.S., will lead to an even worse nightmare for many more of us in the not too distant future.)

We're (not) thankful Dick Cheney has elected to move from his undisclosed location to the media spotlight.
 
I find that having Old Dick out of his hidey hole is a good thing. He is a constant reminder to many of us old, moderate independents why we went screaming to the left of center early in the BuCheney administration. The man is terrifying on so many levels it just ain't funny, but here's what it all boils down to: Either Vice is still trying to scare the crap out of the American people for purely political reasons, if not personal financial reasons as well, or the old fool really believes the psychotic babble he keeps spewing and he really needs the rest of us to be scared witless with him. The latter is certainly understandable in a setting other than on TeeVee news where he is labeled the "former vice president of the U.S." So far as it goes, the label is correct, but if that's as far as it goes, then the label in incorrect. "Former vice president of the U.S., thank God," would be as correct as one could get.

Some knotheads in this country actually believe that God,  no matter what  it's called, should be thanked that Dick The-extremely-paranoid Cheney was our v.p. on 9/11.  I'm not here to argue that point one way or the other, though I fail to see how it mattered one way or the other since there is no official record of Cheney having done anything to prevent any of attacks that happened nor none that might have happened on that day.

I would, however, state my strong belief that having him as v.p from inauguration day, 2001 until he and George walked out of the Capital Building, free as birds, on inauguration day, 2009 is probably the most god-awful thing we've had inflicted on us as a people, a nation, since the civil war. 

Let Cheney speak!!! Please allow it to be obvious to all that Cheney is still wanting to have that fight again. No matter what they tell you, Kidos, the civil war in the late 1800s was about slavery. The current civil war is as well. What's changed is the ease with which one can be identified as a slave. It was easy telling black people from white people back in the day.

Not so much anymore, as slaves come in all colors. In these days, un-free people come in all colors and exist across several socioeconomic levels. What's worse is that corporate America has learned ways to enslave the peoples' money. Take, for example. all of the retirement "schemes" which have left soon-to-be-retirees looking at working for as  far into the future as the eye can see and people who were retired on a modest income having to try to return to the work force. All we need now is for the slaves with their "slave/ very insecure" money to wake the hell up to their own identity. Then, I will be thankful.

We're thankful Al Franken has gone from playing self-help guru Stuart Smalley on Saturday Night Live to helping rape victims receive justice from their employers.

(Damn time someone did!!)

We're thankful for the healing power of beer.


(And wine and coffee in Amsterdam.)

We're thankful there are some on the right who think Glenn Beck is "incoherent," "mindless," "erratic," "bizarre," and "harmful to the conservative movement."


(Not enough people, unfortunately. We are playing seriously loose and free with our sanity, these days. I would be thankful if more Americans demanded that all news media be more honest and do their damn jobs for a change.)

We're thankful for long hikes on the Appalachian Trail.




(Not me. I will never think of the Appalachian trail again that I won't have to also think about that goofy governor and his goofy affair. )

We're thankful Michael Steele understands that he can't "do policy" and that no one has any reason to trust his "words or actions."



(Hey, what up with dat? Steele has yet to figure our that he is just another GOP lawn jockie. A man I actually did admire, Colin Powell, found out the hard way.)

We're (not) thankful for "birthers," "deathers," "tenthers," or "tea baggers."




(Yep, I am of two minds on the a fore mentioned nutcases. TeeVee news seems to want us to believe that these people are having a positive affect, in that more independents are moving to the right. I would disagree with that. Those people make me want to move to Cuba. Not really. Exaggeration for effect. )

We're (not) thankful conservatives believe they love America so much that they can root for our President to fail and for our nation to lose out on hosting the Olympics.


These people have proven that they are not Americans but Rethugs.

We're thankful NFL players refused to "bend over and grab the ankles" for Rush Limbaugh.

Me to!

We're thankful six companies have resigned from the Chamber of Commerce due to its denial of climate change science.

(Me to, but only six? Geese!)

We're thankful Falcon "Balloon boy" Heene wasn't actually in the balloon.

(I wish the entire family and all the anchors who breathlessly reported the story for hours had been in the balloon. We have become Rome.)

We're thankful Lt. Dan Choi and Lt. Col Victor Fehrenbach bravely spoke out against Don't Ask, Don't Tell.

(Me too. Hope it matters.)

We're thankful Shep Smith doesn't always drink the Fox News kool-aid.
  
Me too. Can't watch him because I don't watch Fox anymore. Haven't since December 2001. I did tune in for the Beck experience just to see what all the fuss was about. Scared me so bad I have almost given up TeeVee altogether or watch SyFy. Sy Fy can't top the on-going saga of a man who has, for some reason, been given a big old microphone in the form of his own TeeVee show while he has a mental meltdown on live bers of people who tune in to watch this?TeeVee. We have become Rome! Look at the numbers of people who tune in to watch this? 

We're thankful more than 80 companies refused to lend their sponsorship to Glenn Beck's hateful rants.

(Damn, only 80? Who the hell supports this guy? They must be punished in the only way they understand. $$$$$$)

We're thankful there are progressive organizations in D.C. lobbying for a two-state solution in the Middle East.


(They might want to think about a two state solution for us. )

We're (not) thankful for the filibuster.

(But we will be when we are in the minority again. In the meanwhile, I want the entire debate televised live so the less informed among us can see what a filibuster is and how much we are paying for our senators to read the phone book. )

We're thankful that more than 20,000 of you stood up to Bill O'Reilly's harassment machine and called for impeachment hearings against torture advocate Jay Bybee.

Me Too!!!

We're thankful that Iran's authoritarian rulers live in fear of their own population.


Me Too. Just wish the authoritarians over here were as afraid as the ones in Iran.When the government actually fears the public, Democracy is arriving.

We're thankful we'll no longer have to listen to nativist rhetoric on CNN and global warming skepticism on ABC News.


Didn't listen to it to begin with?.

We're (not) thankful for bailed out CEOs who think they're doing "God's work" by doling out billions in bonuses.


(Me either. Actually, I won't be thankful until said CEOs are working their butts off for minimum wage, living in a run down trailer park, with no healthcare.)

We're thankful for the legacy of the Liberal Lion.


ME TOO. Still sad at his passing.

We're thankful Bill O'Reilly won't be following us home for Thanksgiving.
 
He had better not be anywhere aroud me. I consider him armed and dangeorus.


We're thankful a "wise Latina" sits on the Supreme Court.

I'll reserve judgement. I want to watch her for a few sessions before I say I.m grateful for that.

We're thankful our boss helped rescue imprisoned American journalists in North Korea.


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. PELICAN BLOGS HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR ARE PELICAN BLOGS ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.


"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON THIS BLOG MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Let The Sun Shine In......

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Author Of 9/11 Commission Report: Almost All Lies

Well, finally, someone is doing what should have been done a very long time ago, though I can certainly understand why Mr. Farmer waited until the criminals of the last administration were out of power before he published this book. 



This book is a must read, Pelican Indies. I'm well aware that we have disagreed, often contentiously, about the truth regarding the events of 9/11 and the ensuing anthrax attacks. I guess the only thing we have all agreed upon is that the official story could not possibly be true. If Farmer is telling it straight, and I can see no reason why he would not be given what a pariah he may well become for having written about this topic at all, let alone advising the American people that their government has tried to deceived them, almost completely,; an event that has led to an even worse disaster for our nation than the actual attacks of 9/11. about the most important event in this country since Pearl Harbor



I know that Daniel Elsberg has been calling for whistle-blowers with documentation of any and all crimes to come forward, as patriots of this country, and tell whatever truth they know and can reasonably prove about the Bush/Cheney administration. He and I both know, for similar reasons, that until the people are informed by highly credible people, there will be no accountability for the very serious, appalling crimes most of us agree were committed during the last administration.



I have said, many times, that until the path of truth-seekers and credible truth-tellers leads us back to the events of 9/11, there is really no lasting hope for this nation. Without the truth about 9/11, no matter what it is, we will remain split as a nation, leading, I am afraid, to irreconcilable differences. Every disaster, both foreign and domestic, in the last 8 years is a result of the events of that day and the terrifying anthrax attacks that followed.




If ever there was a time for the light of truth to shine into dark corners and strength and courage of all Americans to face it, no matter how horrifying, sickening and embarrassing we might find that truth, it is now. We have, for too many decades, allowed whitewash commissions and the results of limited hang-out investigations/confessions to stand unchallenged, even when it became obvious we were being sold a bill of goods.



We have allowed duly elected presidents and congresses to "move on," forgive and forget serious crimes of their predecessors, more often than not crimes against the American people and our constitution. Many of the events since the election of 2000 may well be the greatest crimes ever committed by a supposedly "democratically" elected government upon it's own people, not to mention innocent people around the world.

 

The 9/11 Commission Rejects own Report as Based on Government Lies



How long have we watered the Tree of Deceit with the blood of patriots? 



The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11
John Farmer’s book: “The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11″




(CINCINNATI, Ohio) - In John Farmer’s book:  
“The Ground Truth: The Story Behind
America’s Defense on 9/11″, the author builds 
the inescapably convincing case that the official version... is almost entirely untrue...


The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book 
by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for 
the 9/11 Commission.


Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law
and former Attorney General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original flawed 9/11 report.


Does Farmer have cooperation and agreement from other members of the Commission? Yes. Did they say Bush ordered 9/11? No. Do they say that the 9/11 Commission was lied to by the FBI, CIA, White House and NORAD? Yes. Is there full documentary proof of this? Yes.


Farmer states...“at some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened... I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The [Norad air defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. This is not spin.”


The 9/11 Commission head, Thomas Kean, was the Republican governor of New Jersey. He had the following to say... “We to this day don’t know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us, it was just so far from the truth. . . " When Bush's own handpicked commission failed to go along with the cover up and requested a criminal investigation, why was nothing done?
9/11 Commission member and former US Senator, Bob Kerrey, says, "No one is more qualified to write the definitive book about the tragedy of 9/11 than John Farmer. Fortunately, he has done so. Even more fortunately the language is clear, alive and instructive for anyone who wants to make certain this never happens again."


Here's my never answered question regarding the last sentence of the of the above paragraph: What, pray tell, can we, the people, do to make sure this never happens again? I mean, exactly, what can we do? 


What lengths, short of violence, must we be willing to go to in order to assure that no official in administrations to come, people within political parties in coming congresses, corporate officers in major international corporations and in the military-industrial-security-fossil fuel complex or in financial institutions will think not only twice but several dozen times before any of them would even entertain more than a very fleeting thought of conspiring against the American people through deceit, especially deceit involving fear-mongering?


With the only "official" 9/11 report now totally false, where do we go from here? Who is hurt by these lies? The families of the victims of 9/11 have fought, for years, to get to the truth. For years, our government has hidden behind lies and secrecy to deny them closure.


However, in my mind, not only the families of the victims who died on 9/11, but all Americans who have been hurt be the lies of the Bush administration and, God only knows,  how many co-conspirators outside of government. Neocons holding no official positions come to mind as well as some corporate pals of Bush and/or Cheney all of whom had something big to gain if the dreams of the Neocons of PNAC fame were realized. Many of us were completely deceived for various periods of time. Some of us still are. The nation has suffered in countless ways not the least of which is our loss of blood and treasure. Our country's reputation and credibility have been devastated way beyond what Vietnam did.  Two wars and the most un-freakin-believable war profiteering in modern history have left our nation on the brink of another great depression, while GOP foreign nor domestic policies have done nothing to make Americans more secure at home. As a matter of fact, their policies have, as usual, been more about corporate welfare than the welfare of the people.


It is past time for Americans to, for once, see the whole truth, no matter how ugly and embarrassing it is. Until we face the truth about ourselves and our government, our nation will continue on the road to wrack and ruin. Honesty with ourselves, transparency, confession of our transgressions, citizen demand for accountability for the "deciders" in our own government, as well as their own illegal combatant allies and, finally, recognize that we, the people, have become much too tolerant of deceit, whether the lies are by corporations, politicians or the corporate owned media.


In 2006, The Washington Post reported..."Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources. Staff members and some commissioners thought that e-mails and other evidence provided enough probable cause to believe that military and aviation officials violated the law by making false statements to Congress and to the commission..."


What does Farmer's book tell us? Farmer offers no solutions, only a total and full rejection of what was told and his own his own ideas concerning the total failure of honesty on the part of the government, a government with something to hide.


Farmer never tells us what. Nobody could keep a job in the public sector speaking out more than Farmer has. What were Farmer's omissions? There are some. Now that we know that intelligence given the 9/11 Commission wasn't just lies from our own government but based on testimony coerced through torture from informants forced to back up a cover story now proven false, a pattern emerges.


We know that, immediately after 9/11, many more potential suspects and informants were flown directly to
Saudi Arabia by Presidential order than were ever detained and questioned. We will never know what they could have said. Their testimony would have been vital to any real investigation were they not put beyond the reach of even Congress and the FBI.


Putting aside all other questions of recent evidence of CIA involvement with bin Laden prior to 9/11 or altered physical evidence involving the Pentagon attack, any failure to call to account the systematic perjury committed by dozens of top government officials, now exposed as a certainty is an offense to every American.


What do we know? We know the conjecture about 9/11 still stands but for certain, we know we were lied to, not in a minor way, but systematically as part of a plot covering up government involvement at nearly every level, perhaps gross negligence, perhaps something with darker intent.


If all we find is negligence, it is not merely gross, but criminal negligence.


Are we willing to live with another lie to go with the Warren Report, Iran Contra and so many others? Has the sacrifice of thousands more Americans, killed, wounded or irreparably damaged by a war knowingly built on the same lies from the same liars who misled the 9/11 Commission pushed us beyond willingness to confront the truth?


Have we yet found where the lies have begun and ended? There is no evidence of this, only evidence to the contrary. The lies live on and the truth will never be sought. The courage for that task has not been found.
Can anyone call themselves an American if they don't demand, even with the last drop of their blood, that the truth be found?


How long have we watered the Tree of Deceit with the blood of patriots?

Just guessing, of course,  I'd say around 60 years, at least. "The blood of patriots" may have been spilled for deceit before in our history, but for the last 60 years, the blood letting has been intense, even when it did not seem so, and pretty much continuous, even though, until the attacks on the WTC and Washington, D.C., war has not been declared by our Congress, the only part of our government who has the power to do so, since WWII.



Dwight Eisenhower warned us about the military-industrial-complex in his farewell address to the nation. I imagine that were he resurrected into today's America, he would be horrified by corporate control of America, way beyond just the old military-industrial complex.


================================================
 
Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran and a regular contributor to Veterans 
Today. He specializes in political and social issues. You can see a large collection of Gordon's published articles at this link: VeteransToday.com.

He is an outspoken advocate for veterans and his powerful words have brought about change. Gordon is a lifelong PTSD sufferer from his war experiences and he is empathetic to the plight of today's veterans also suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. We greatly appreciate the opportunity to feature Gordon's timely and critical reports on Salem-News.com, a news organization staffed by a number of veterans, particularly former U.S. Marines.

You can send Gordon Duff an email at this address: Gpduf@aol.com



IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. PELICAN BLOGS HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR ARE PELICAN BLOGS ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.


"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON THIS BLOG MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Let The Sun Shine In......

Sunday, September 20, 2009

Investement Banker Quits Lehman, Exposes Wall Street

Leaving Lehman, exposing Wall Street
September 20, 2009:






Leaving Lehman, exposing Wall St Pt.5
Kapoor: The financial reforms on the table are not enough  September 20, 2009
Derivatives and tax havens
Kapoor Pt4: One-third of all global economic activity passes through tax havens, with little difficulty  September 18, 09
More volatility equals more profit
Sony Kapoor PT3: The more volatile the financial environment is, the more profit investment banks make  September 17, 2009
Wall street musical chairs continues
Sony Kapoor: Leaving Lehman, exposing Wall Street Pt.2  September 16, 2009
Leaving Lehman, exposing Wall Street
Sony Kapoor left life as an investment banker to reveal the "dark magic" of finance capital  September 14, 200
IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. PELICAN BLOGS HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR ARE PELICAN BLOGS ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.


"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON THIS BLOG MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Let The Sun Shine In......

How Can A Diseased, Dysfunctional Congress Be Expected To Do Anything About Broken Healthcare

So, what do we do about it? 


P.M. Carpenter


I try my best to avoid writing apocalyptic pieces, since, according to the blogosphere, the sky has been falling with almost daily regularity since roughly the blogosphere's creation. Still, it's time to look around and acknowledge that, to seize on just the latest example, Sen. Max Baucus' wasted days and wasted nights of fraudulent bipartisanship were but the tip of a representative democracy on the major skids. And recovery is questionable.


Yesterday I noted the Politico's characterization of contemporary bipartisanship as "The Great Myth" -- every Washington pol knows, observed the paper, "that the political incentives driving them toward conflict are vastly stronger than any impulses they may personally harbor for conciliation and compromise" -- yet failed bipartisanship is but a symptom, it seems to me and many others, of that far uglier disease mentioned above, which we'll return to momentarily.


First a rapid survey, as outlined by the Politico, of the reasons why modern bipartisanship nearly always crashes. And there's no better place to begin than at the Politico's beginning: the stain of redistricting, a corruption of democracy "that allows the two parties to conspire to make a big chunk of House seats virtual locks for one party or the other, meaning the typical member has scant reason to gravitate to the ideological center."


Then the gauntlet of primaries does its damage. In any ideologically extreme district, or at a minimum, within any ideologically extreme primary base, there's no safety in the middle; this has been especially true in redder districts, where races to the bottom of Reason have dominated the candidate-selection process. The results: "The past three elections have basically clipped off the moderate wing of the GOP.... [M]ost of the Republicans left don’t consider the Democratic criticism -- that the GOP has become 'the party of no' -- to be much of an insult."

(Actually, moderate Republicans are now Democrats, making everything more confusing. Right now, the GOP is purely ideological and constantly courting the crusading crackpots and other wing-nuts on the Right and the Democrats are not. Still, because the Democrats, still seen by many as flaming Liberals, are actually liberal, moderate and conservative. For the most ideological party, it is true, that they have no incentive to do what's best for the people. Rather, they believe that it is in the best interest of everyone that they win, as they cannot possibly see any good in any ideas other than their own. That is the very definition of rigid ideology. Therefore, there is no need for reconciliation. Actually, they see any move toward compromise as against their own need to win power in order to codify their own beliefs. Who has not heard Republicans vilify Democrats because they cannot seem to get their own house in order?)

And in politics, crap runs uphill. Notes the Politico: "The Senate, which despite its public reputation as the reasonable, statesmanlike chamber, has been indisputably more partisan the past decade, in part because so many House members are graduating to the upper chamber and bringing their tactics with them."


Of not inconsiderable influence is the "new media culture" as well, a remorseless jackhammering of sensationalism and superficiality "that guarantees plenty of cable TV time and fundraising success for the most flamboyantly confrontational figures" -- just witness the sudden death and miraculous resurrection of Rep. Joe Wilson -- "and the partisan fire burns wildly."


An exiguous list, for sure -- hey, this is the Internet, where readers' attention span is as scanty as any list must be; if you've made it this far, my heartiest congratulations, you're one of the plucky few -- but rounding it out nicely the other night was a conversation, on "The PBS Newshour," between NY Times' columnist Ross Douthat and political historian Richard Norton Smith.


Actually it was more of a riveting mini-debate of a gargantuan issue -- a squaring off of the "extreme partisanship is only natural" side (Douthat) against the "extreme partisanship is unforgivable" argument (obviously, Smith's).


Thrusted Douthat: "What we're seeing, in a way, is the working out of something that's been happening for 50 years in the United States, which is that the parties are sorted by ideology in a way that they hadn't in the '40s, '50s and '60s.... [N]ow you have a much more -- you could say a much more rational system, where you have a liberal party and a conservative party. But what that means is that you're going to have ... real divergence, real heated debate, and real inter-party tension.... [Y]ou'd expect that a large Democratic Party and a shrunken Republican Party to have a very hard time finding common ground."


Parried Smith: "[I]t may be rational in theory to have a neat liberal party and a conservative party. But we see an awful lot of irrationality arising out of that equation this summer.... [N]ot only the political culture has been coarsened, the country has been coarsened over the last 40 years. Forty years ago ... they may have been liberals or conservatives. And they fought like cats and dogs until 6 o'clock. But at the end of the day, there were political incentives for them to seek out common ground. Consensus was not a dirty word. Differences were seen as something to be narrowed, rather than exploited."


Plus, added Smith, rather delightfully, "We [now] have cable networks that should be registered with the Federal Election Commission," and, more ominously, we "have all of these outside forces, including lobbyists, whose business ... it is to pour kerosene upon those differences rather than try to put out the fire."


I once subscribed wholeheartedly to Douthat's argument. A cleanly delineated liberal vs. conservative system is indeed a rational, perhaps even desirable, one. But ours, as Smith poignantly observed, has evolved as a harshly divided one without the rationality.


What we have, instead, is a vastly unrepresentative Congress -- the sorry result of rather acrobatic redistricting and hardcore-base groveling -- encouraged 24/7 by "outrage"-obsessed media -- ratings, ratings, ratings -- and fueled by the worst sort of capitalist concentrations of grotesque wealth -- corporate plutocrats -- and those who represent it -- lobbyists.

AMEN!

It only gets worse. And there seems to be no way out. Incumbents and their mothering parties positively adore the tidy ideological diaper-pinning of electoral safety; the media, from talk radio to Fox to MSNBC, aren't about to let loose of a profitable ratings game ruled by conflict; and the growing malignity of big money in politics is of course self-sustaining -- its recipients aren't about to cut their own throats with the sharp remedial blade of public finance.


What we're left with -- maybe, stuck with -- is a bracing, Congressional dysfunctionality, a gross corruption of representative democracy that indeed benefits the very few, but screws the hell out of most. Just take a gander someday at this nation's gaping income inequality -- to date, a statistical trajectory of steep ascent with only fleeting disruptions; I'd also advise having a stiff one, first, but after reading this, you may want to do that anyway.


Ironic, is it not, that our systemic political disease is now being tested by the matter of health care.


Please respond to P.M.'s commentary by leaving comments below and sharing them with the BuzzFlash community. For personal questions or comments you can contact him at fifthcolumnistmail@gmail.com

IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. PELICAN BLOGS HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR ARE PELICAN BLOGS ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.


"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON THIS BLOG MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Let The Sun Shine In......

Friday, September 11, 2009

Insurance Companies Can't Be Held Accountable If They Can Dictate Legislation

Chris Bowers is right on! This is all about who runs this country, in the final analysis. 

Is it the people, the bought-and-paid-for, by big corporations, elected officials, or the officers of big corporations, who continue to see that their stock options don't bleed nor do their bonuses cease to reach astounding, if not nauseating heights, even when they have run their conpanies into the ground with deceitful business and accounting practices?


I guess we will soon know where we stand.When that happens, if we see what we believe to be the truth, that corporate types run not only our nation, but more or less the whole world, it will be time for people of intelligence and decency to come up with a way to deal with the people who buy our elected officials and screw the people every chance they get.

 If these deceitful, greedy fear-mongers cannot be held accountable under laws they help write, it will be up to the citizens to hold them accountable by way of mass non-violent action.


 

by: Chris Bowers

Thu Sep 10, 2009 at 15:25


Last night, President Obama said that he wants to hold insurance companies accountable:
Now, I have no interest in putting insurance companies out of business.  They provide a legitimate service, and employ a lot of our friends and neighbors.  I just want to hold them accountable.

And he told House Progressives that the public option was only one of many possible means to that end:
To my progressive friends, I would remind you that for decades, the driving idea behind reform has been to end insurance company abuses and make coverage affordable for those without it.  The public option is only a means to that end - and we should remain open to other ideas that accomplish our ultimate goal.

In response, I submit the following: it is impossible for the federal government to hold insurance companies accountable if those insurance companies can dictate whatever types of legislation they want to Congress.
Private health insurance companies have made the public option just as much of a sticking point as House 
 Progressives have. Whereas House Progressives have stated they will oppose any health care reform legislation without a "robust" public option, private health insurance companies have stated they will oppose any legislation that includes one.
If these private health insurance companies can have a public option removed from health care legislation just because they do, then there is really no way to hold private health insurance companies accountable. If these companies have enough control over the federal government that they can dictate legislation against the wishes of the member of Congress themselves, then there is simply no way that the federal government can hold private health insurance companies accountable by any means.

So far under the Democratic trifecta, we had stimulus bill that was approved of by the Chamber of Commerce. We saw limits on executive compensation for firms receiving bailout money removed from that same stimulus bill in order to get those executives to accept hundreds of billions in government loans. We had bankruptcy reform favorable to people losing their homes removed from housing legislation in order to appease those same banks. We saw six Democratic Senators flip on card check legislation to appease large employers. We saw a climate change bill that gives away billions of dollars worth of pollution permits to major polluters for free. Now, we have a health insurance industry seeking to kill a public health insurance option just because there might be a chance that providing insurance to people without providing hundreds of millions in salaries to executives might actually result in lower-priced health insurance.



I submit that as long as powerful financial institutions--and that is exactly what private health insurance companies are--can dictate legislation to Congress, then there is no possible way for Congress to hold those financial institutions accountable. You can't drop the public option at the behest of private health insurers and then still think you are somehow going to hold those insurers accountable through a different means.




(We could not agree more! As long as these crooks called corporate officers are not held accountable lawfully for their greed and other heinous behavior and we cannot get the big money out of politics, the ordinary Joes and Josephines of America don't stand a chance of not living the rest of their lives under crushing debt and real death panels run by big health-care corporations, but which are never talked about.  Nothing of any importance will ever change in this country until we demand 1) publicly funded campaigns and elections, 2)  that the electoral college is abolished, at least in its current form and 3) that every voting machine in America has a paper trail.)



This fight is about who runs the country. If Congress drops the public option, it will be because private health insurers told them to drop it. If there is no public option, then these powerful corporations and financial institutions are the ones telling Congress what to do, not the other way around. And when someone is only and ever giving you orders, good luck ever holding that someone accountable. Ever.




IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. PELICAN BLOGS HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR ARE PELICAN BLOGS ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.


"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON THIS BLOG MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Let The Sun Shine In......

Saturday, August 29, 2009

U.S. Interrogators In Favor of Crminal Investigation

The article below reflects what our source, a former Intel. operative, told us and it certainly fits with common sense which, unfortunately, isn't all that common in American anymore.


Support for a wide-ranging criminal investigation into the Bush administration's use of torture has grown to include a former top FBI interrogator and a career military intelligence officer with more than two decades of experience conducting interrogations.
   
Jack Cloonan, a former FBI security and counterterrorism expert who was assigned to the agency's elite Bin Laden Unit, and Col. Steve Kleinman, a career military intelligence officer recognized as one of the Defense Department's most effective interrogators, said ignoring clear-cut evidence of interrogation-related crimes would encourage more law-breaking in the future.

Cloonan and Kleinman, who conducted interrogations of terror suspects after 9/11, disputed claims by former CIA Director Michael Hayden and Republican lawmakers that a criminal investigation would damage intelligence gathering and could lead to another 9/11-type attack on the United States.

In an interview, Cloonan and Kleinman said Hayden and the lawmakers were sounding "false alarms" in an effort to keep serious crimes from being exposed. "What this is really about is cover your ass," Cloonan said. "To suggest [intelligence gathering] will come to a screeching halt if there were an investigation is not accurate."
   

Cloonan, who retired in 2002 after more than 25 years in the FBI, said he doesn't believe an investigation would lead to a terrorist attack. Kleinman, who most recently served as a senior adviser on a director of national intelligence-commissioned study on strategic interrogation, agreed.


"I'm a professional interrogator, I have 25 years of experience in this and I don't have any concern whatsoever that an investigation into how we conducted ourselves since 9/11 would in any way undermine our ability to continue gathering intelligence," Kleinman said.


Furthermore, Kleinman and Cloonan believe many of their colleagues in the intelligence community share their views. But many are unable to speak out publicly, Kleinman said, "because to do so is almost a career ender."

Kleinman and Cloonan added that the outside contractors and the interrogators, who lacked the training and experience, are the ones who saw the use of torture as a means to gain valuable information. Moreover, they are the ones who fear an investigation.


"The people who are true professionals don't see anything wrong with an investigation," Kleinman said. "I conducted interrogations in three separate military campaigns. I can look back if they called me in tomorrow and I would not even be thinking about getting liability insurance."

 

Investigation Opposed


Ex-CIA Director Hayden had a different view. At a panel discussion on the outsourcing of intelligence last Thursday, Hayden said an investigation, "no matter how narrowly defined," would undermine counterterrorism efforts.


"Continuing looking back, continuing to pull these good people through a knothole will teach people never to play to the edge, will teach people 'yeah I got an opinion from Justice and I know the President wants me to do it and the director [of the CIA] says it's a good thing and I know I'm capable of doing it but I just don't think so.'


"We will teach timidity to a workforce we need to be vigorous and active. And no matter how narrowly defined this look back might be it'll start pulling threads, you'll have a significant number of agency folks being pulled through this process, in my mind, to no good," he said.


A day earlier, nine Republican senators sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder saying a criminal investigation into the CIA's interrogation practices would jeopardize the "security for all Americans" and "chill future intelligence activities."


Cloonan, Kleinman and Matthew Alexander, who was the senior interrogator for the task force in Iraq that tracked down al-Qaeda-in-Iraq leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in 2006, sent a letter on Friday to the chairs of the House and Senate Intelligence and Judiciary Committees calling for the creation of a bipartisan commission to "assess policy making that led to use of torture and cruelty in interrogations." ("Matthew Alexander" is a pseudonym used by the interrogator for security reasons.)


They wrote that a special counsel is an "important step forward" by reaffirming "the enduring power of our system of checks and balances."


"The prohibition on torture in this country is unequivocal," Cloonan, Alexander and Kleinman wrote. "To ignore evidence of criminal wrongdoing would incentivize future breaches of law."

However, they added that an investigation and the potential for prosecutions "of individuals who violated anti-torture statutes alone ... will not prevent policy makers from making similar mistakes in the future."
The veteran interrogators said an examination was needed into the problems created when "policy makers ignored the advice of experienced interrogators, counterterrorism experts and respected military leaders who warned that using torture and cruelty would be ineffective and counter-productive."

House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers and his counterpart in the Senate, Patrick Leahy, have advocated a truth commission to look into the use of torture and other abuses that took place during the Bush administration.


But Leahy said he would not follow through on his plan without the support of Republicans, which he does not have, and Conyers's proposal never even gained the support of key Democrats. President Obama told lawmakers in closed-door meetings earlier this year that he did not support those efforts.

 
Heavy Costs


But Kleinman, Cloonan and Alexander said a serious investigation was needed because the Bush administration's policies "came with heavy costs."


"Key allies, in some instances, refused to share needed intelligence, terrorists attacks increased worldwide, and al Qaeda and like-minded groups recruited a new generation of Jihadists," they wrote.

"A nonpartisan, independent commission with subpoena power should assess the deeply flawed policy making framework behind the decision to permit torture and cruelty. Our system of checks and balances is designed to produce sound policy decisions which advance our strategic interests and are in accordance with our core values of due process."
Kleinman said he also was "disappointed" with a Washington Post op-ed by CIA Director Leon Panetta, who urged lawmakers to "move on" from talk of investigations and to resist focusing on the past.


"Every world-class intelligence organization look at where they come from to get better," Kleinman said. "I think it's critical a lot of people say this is a witch hunt. I think they're wrong."

Cloonan and Kleinman also doubted claims, like those made by Dick Cheney, that the use of torture produced actionable intelligence, the type that helped prevent another terrorist attack on US soil and "saved hundreds of thousands of lives," to quote the former vice president.

Cloonan said he had a "long conversation" with members of the Senate Intelligence Committee after he testified before the panel last year and was told that there isn't a smoking-gun document that will show torture was effective on any of the high-value detainees who were brutally tortured.


Kleinman noted that the news media reported over the weekend that the CIA's inspector general report will show that agency interrogators conducted a mock execution, brandishing a gun and a power drill during the interrogation of at least one detainee.


"I defy anybody in the intelligence community to bring forward the research, the thoughtful objective analysis that purports to support that mock executions is a consistent and effective means of getting accurate information from people," Kleinman said. "Show me the studies that say causing a great deal of fear is consistently successful in getting useful information. 'Cause there won't be.


"What people are doing is they're just scrambling because they don't know what else to do. They're scrambling for some sort of technique and they're just using things that they think 'well that will scare me so it must scare them. It would make me talk so it must make them talk.'


"Sure, they'll talk. But they're talking because they are afraid they are going to die. And they will say anything to keep from dying."


By Jason Leopold, the editor in chief of The Public Record, www.pubrecord.org.


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. PELICAN BLOGS HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR ARE PELICAN BLOGS ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.


"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON THIS BLOG MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Let The Sun Shine In......

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Good Journey, Uncle Teddy

This morning, I awoke to the news that Teddy Kennedy had died. Even though this came as no shock, given his condition, his death did make for a sad day. As President Obama said, it was a day we all knew was coming.....a day we all dreaded.
At age 60, I cannot really remember a time when there wasn't a Kennedy in power. Before I was an independent, I was a Kennedy Democrat. When Bobby was killed, I became an independent but, nevertheless, a constituent-at-large of Teddy's. 

He heard from me far more often than senators of the many states in which I have lived. He always answered although I never lived in Mass. 

Teddy's death was the first of the Kennedy brothers' did not come as a shock, with the exception of Joe Jr., whom I never knew. 

Our very best to Vicki and the kids. We share your grief as we shared Teddy's when his brothers were killed. 

Without Teddy, I feel lost. 

I have a deadly cancer, squamous cell carcinoma. Though it is in remission, the prognosis is not good. When I awoke to the news of Teddy's death this morning, I said, "Good journey, Uncle Teddy, I will see you soon."

In many ways I hope that I will. Teddy never gave up. I doubt I have his courage or will. 

God bless you, Teddy. Thank you for standing up for us all these years. I do hope I will see you and your bothers soon.


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. PELICAN BLOGS HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR ARE PELICAN BLOGS ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON THIS BLOG MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Let The Sun Shine In......

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Southern Povery Law Firm: Troubling Uptick In Militia Activity

There was a time that militias were necessary for the defense of our young country. Most of the militia activity in recent history threatens the national welfare and what we believe is soul of our country: equal rights under the constitution, for all Americans and legal residents of the nation among other truly moral issues. 
Equally troubling, is the racist tint of the current movement, ironically called the "patriot movement," caused, it is believed, by the election of a black president.  After what the heroes of the civil rights movement of the late '50s and 60s, both black and white, went through to try to guarantee simple human rights and civil rights under our constitution, such as the right to vote, this development is nothing less that nauseatingly frightening!
To those of us who were politically active in the civil rights movement this development causes feelings of anger and of being fed up with having to "fight" the same battles over and over again simply to fulfill the promises of the founding of a nation based on freedom and basic human rights. 

Our country was founded on such high principles that even the founders themselves could not live up to its promise. Over the decades, we have struggled to live as they could not; more in the light of our founding ideas and principles. We have, at times, failed and have, at other times, succeeded. 

Still, it is apparent that we must continue the struggle to move beyond fear and hatred. Yes, the struggle continues to live according to the whispering of the better angels of our nature. It is not always easy but it is essential not only for the soul of our nation but for our own spiritual well-being as well.

We should never forget the lesson of WWII Germany. If we are not willing to stand for the basic human rights of our fellow citizens, for their freedom, as well as our own, we will have only ourselves to blame when our very lives are threatened by the fear and hatred of others. 
We are either all free and are guaranteed the same civil rights or we are not. 

The Southern Poverty Law Firm has stood for freedom from intimidation, and worse, for many years now and they deserve our support in whatever form we can offer it.


 
 
The Militia Movement
The Second Wave
The return of the militias and the larger anti-government 'Patriot' movement

Nativists to 'Patriots'
Nativist vigilantes increasingly adopting the ideas of the 'Patriot' movement

Terror from the Right
75 plots, conspiracies and racist rampages since Oklahoma City

Download the report (PDF)
The 1990s saw the rise and fall of the virulently anti-government "Patriot" movement, made up of paramilitary militias, tax defiers and so-called "sovereign citizens." Sparked by a combination of anger at the federal government and the deaths of political dissenters at Ruby Ridge, Idaho, and Waco, Texas, the movement took off in the middle of the decade and continued to grow even after 168 people were left dead by the 1995 bombing of Oklahoma City's federal building — an attack, the deadliest ever by domestic U.S. terrorists, carried out by men steeped in the rhetoric and conspiracy theories of the militias. In the years that followed, a truly remarkable number of criminal plots came out of the movement. But by early this century, the Patriots had largely faded, weakened by systematic prosecutions, aversion to growing violence, and a new, highly conservative president.

They're back. Almost a decade after largely disappearing from public view, right-wing militias, ideologically driven tax defiers and sovereign citizens are appearing in large numbers around the country. "Paper terrorism" — the use of property liens and citizens' "courts" to harass enemies — is on the rise. And once-popular militia conspiracy theories are making the rounds again, this time accompanied by nativist theories about secret Mexican plans to "reconquer" the American Southwest. One law enforcement agency has found 50 new militia training groups — one of them made up of present and former police officers and soldiers.  

Authorities around the country are reporting a worrying uptick in Patriot activities and propaganda. "This is the most significant growth we've seen in 10 to 12 years," says one. "All it's lacking is a spark. I think it's only a matter of time before you see threats and violence."


A key difference this time is that the federal government — the entity that almost the entire radical right views as its primary enemy — is headed by a black man. That, coupled with high levels of non-white immigration and a decline in the percentage of whites overall in America, has helped to racialize the Patriot movement, which in the past was not primarily motivated by race hate. One result has been a remarkable rash of domestic terror incidents since the presidential campaign, most of them related to anger over the election of Barack Obama. At the same time, ostensibly mainstream politicians and media pundits have helped to spread Patriot and related propaganda, from conspiracy theories about a secret network of U.S. concentration camps to wholly unsubstantiated claims about the president's country of birth.


Fifteen years ago, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote then-Attorney General Janet Reno to warn about extremists in the militia movement, saying that the "mixture of armed groups and those who hate" was "a recipe for disaster." Just six months later, Oklahoma City's federal building was bombed. Today, the Patriot movement may not have the white-hot fury that it did in the 1990s. But the movement clearly is growing again, and Americans, in particular law enforcement officers, need to take the dangers it presents seriously. That is equally true for the politicians, pundits and preachers who, through pandering or ignorance, abet the growth of a movement marked by a proven predilection for violence.
 
Page:  1   2   3 

IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. PELICAN BLOGS HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR ARE PELICAN BLOGS ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.


"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON THIS BLOG MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Let The Sun Shine In......

Friday, August 21, 2009

Blackwater's Unwritten Death Contract


Does any of this come as a surprise to anyone?


Blackwater, or XE as they are now called, are a corrupt, sociopathic, religiously insane gang. That's all that needs to be said about these cuckoo birds.
The only question is, as usual; when will they be held accountable?



I use “they” advisedly, since the CIA officials who had kept Panetta in the dark continue to function as Panetta’s top managers at the agency.


Until now, it was not clear what prompted Panetta to set up hurried consultations in late June with the intelligence oversight committees of the House and Senate. And an odd odor still hangs over the affair.


After being briefed by Panetta, one committee member described him as “stunned” that his lingering lieutenants had kept information on the program from him until nearly five months into his tenure.


And yet there is not the faintest hint that anyone on either committee dared to ask why Panetta continues to leave such tainted officials in very senior positions.
Mazzetti quotes officials as admitting that “the C.I.A. did not have a formal contract with Blackwater” for a program with “lethal” authority.


What Mazzetti does not mention — and what he, like the vast majority of Americans, may not know — is that there is a one-sentence umbrella “contract” available for use as authorization for such activities. It is a legal loophole of sorts, through which Bush and Cheney drove a Mack truck.


Bush administration lawyers were not the first to read considerable leeway into that loophole — one sentence in the language of the National Security Act of 1947. The sentence can be (ab)used as authorization for all manner of crimes — irrespective of existing law or executive order.


A Cheney-esque “unitary executive” perspective and a dismissive attitude toward lawmakers reinforced George W. Bush’s predilection to exploit this ambiguous language, taking it further than it had ever been taken in the past.



The Act (as slightly amended) stipulates that the CIA Director shall:


“Perform such functions and duties related to intelligence affecting the national security as the President or the National Security Council may from time to time direct.”
There’s the “umbrella contract.” While more than one past President (I served under seven during my tenure at CIA) has taken advantage of that open language, the Bush administration translated the dodging into a new art form.

This, in turn, was sustained by Frankenstein cottage industries like Blackwater to launch and operate the administration’s own Gestapo. I use the word advisedly; do not blanch before it.
As for outsourcing, the Nazi Gestapo enjoyed umbrella authorization from the Fuhrer; they and the SS knew what was wanted, and famously “followed orders.”


There was absolutely no need to go back to supreme authority for approval to contract out some of their work. German legislators turned out to be even more intimidated than ours — if you can imagine it.


Charlatans Can Apply…and Stay


As for an American President’s freedom of action, all a President need do is surround himself with eager co-conspirators like the sycophant former Director of Central Intelligence, George Tenet, (not to mention his, and Panetta’s, lingering lieutenants) who give allegiance to their secret world of unchecked power, rather than to the Constitution of the United States.


True, a Vice President thoroughly versed in using the levers of power can be a valuable asset. But the sine quo non for successful subversion of our Constitutional process is this: cowardly members of Congress so afraid of being painted pastel on terrorism that they abdicate their oversight responsibility.


George W. Bush and Dick Cheney made “terrorification” of Congress a high priority, and congressional leaders caved, winking even at torture, kidnapping, warrantless eavesdropping, etc., etc., etc.


Speaking of contracting, Congress’ oversight role was, in a very real sense, “contracted out” — to eight invertebrate leaders from the House and Senate whose unconscionable, see-no-evil acquiescence was driven solely by their felt need to appear tough on terrorism.


“After 9/11 everything changed,” is certainly an overused aphorism. But it does apply to the spirit and soul of our country, after President Bush was given the pulpit at National Cathedral.
Vengeance is ours, said the President. And the vast majority of Christian leaders were cowed into razoring out of their Bibles “Blessed are the Peacemakers.”


The clergy clapped, and so did the Congress and the Fawning Corporate Media (FCM). Don’t you remember?


The situation bears a striking resemblance to that described by writer Sebastian Haffner in Berlin in 1933 after the Reichstag fire (Germany’s 9/11):


“What was missing is what in animals is called ‘breeding.’ This is a solid inner kernel that cannot be shaken by external pressures, something noble and steely, a reserve of pride, principle, and dignity to be drawn on in the hour of trial. It is missing in Germans.


“As a nation they are without backbone. That was shown in March 1933. At the moment of truth, when other nations rise spontaneously to the occasion, the Germans collectively and limply collapsed, yielded to a nervous breakdown, and became a nightmare to the rest of the world.” [Defying Hitler, p. 135]



Stormy Applause


And our Congress? During the President’s infamous State-of-the-Union address on Jan. 28, 2003 (yes, the one with the uranium-from-Africa-to-Iraq and other make-believe), Bush got the most unbridled applause when, after bragging about the 3,000 “suspected terrorists” whom he said had been arrested, he added:


“And many others have met a different fate. Let's put it this way: They are no longer a problem to the United States and our friends and allies.”


The lawmakers’ reaction and the cheering that followed in the FCM reminded me of the short italicized note that Pravda regularly tacked onto the bottom of paragraphs recording the text of similarly fulsome leadership speeches: Burniye aplaudismenti; vce stoyat! — Stormy applause; all rise!


Even so, Soviet leaders generally avoided (as not quite presidential) the seeking of applause for thinly veiled allusions to extrajudicial killing.


It is Congress that is collectively responsible for abdicating its oversight responsibility, while cheering on creeps like Cofer Black, CIA’s top counter-terrorism official from 1999 to May 2002 and now one of Blackwater’s senior leaders.


In his prepared testimony to a joint congressional 9/11 inquiry on Sept. 26, 2002, the swashbuckling Black said this about “operational flexibility”:


"All I want to say is that there was ‘before’ 9/11 and ‘after’ 9/11. After 9/11 the gloves came off. ... I know that we are on the right track today and as a result we are safer as a nation. ‘No Limits’ aggressive, relentless, worldwide pursuit of any terrorist who threatens us is the only way to go and is the bottom line.”


What were those “gloves” to which you referred, Mr. Black? Do you mean that legal restrictions were gone? And “No Limits?” Is it the case that there now are no limitations on your pursuit of terrorists?


From what do you derive that kind of authorization, Mr. Black? These are just sample questions that, apparently, occurred to none of the congressional inquiry members to ask.


And authorization? In the Bush/Cheney White House, all it took was a presidential signature, like that appearing in strokes of large felt-tipped pen under the two-page executive memorandum of Feb. 7, 2002.


Last December the Senate Armed Forces Committee, without dissent, concluded that this memo
, “opened the door” to abusive interrogation by exempting al Qaeda and Taliban detainees from Geneva protections. Alberto Gonzales, in an inadvertent blunder, released that memo five years ago.


Special presidential memos (often referred to as “Findings”) authorizing covert action like the lethal activities of the CIA and Blackwater have not yet surfaced. They will, in due course, if the patriotic truth tellers who have now spoken to the Times and the Washington Post about CIA and Blackwater continue to put the Constitution and courage above secrecy oaths.



The Savage Mood


CIA operative Gary Schroen told National Public Radio that, just days after 9/11, Cofer Black sent him to Afghanistan with orders to “Capture bin Laden, kill him, and bring his head back in a box on dry ice.” As for other al Qaeda leaders, Black reportedly said, “I want their heads up on pikes.”


Schroen told NPR he had been stunned that, for the first time in 30 years of service, he had received orders to kill targets rather than to capture them. Contacted by the radio network, Black would not confirm the exact words of the order to Schroen, but did not dispute Schroen’s account.


This quaint tone reverberated among macho pundits in the FCM. Washington Post veteran Jim Hoagland, who was extremely well plugged in to the Bush administration, on Oct. 31, 2001, wrote an open letter to President Bush.


Apparently no Halloween prank, Hoagland strongly endorsed the wish for “Osama bin Laden’s head on a pike,” a wish he attributed to Bush’s “generals and diplomats.” The consummate insider, Hoagland then almost gave the real game away, giving Bush a list of priorities:


“The need to deal with Iraq’s continuing accumulation of biological and chemical weapons and the technology to build a nuclear bomb can in no way be lessened by the demands of the Afghan campaign. You must conduct that campaign so that you can pivot quickly from it to end the threat Saddam Hussein’s regime poses.”


I have the feeling we are in for many more chapters recording how the savage mood in Washington played out during the last seven years of the Bush/Cheney administration.


Yes, Ray, but when, if ever, will something be done about it?


Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, the publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington. He was a CIA analyst for 27 years and now serves on the Steering Group of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).

IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. PELICAN BLOGS HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR ARE PELICAN BLOGS ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.


"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON THIS BLOG MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Let The Sun Shine In......