Showing posts with label Sean Hannity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sean Hannity. Show all posts

Saturday, April 3, 2010

Sean Hannity On The Loose

BILL BERKOWITZ FOR BUZZFLASH

Hannity on the Loose:  A best-selling book, an expansive book tour and a charity gone rogue
While Sean Hannity’s new book, “Conservative Victory: Defeating Obama's Radical Agenda” will no doubt hit the best-seller list, his so-called Freedom Concerts may be landing on another list; a list of organizations not to be trusted with the public’s donations.  

The other day I received an email from the Heritage Foundation -- signed by its president Edward Fuelner -- letting me know that Sean Hannity’s new book has been released. The book, according to Fuelner, “spells out exactly what needs to be done to rescue America from the clutches of a destructive leftist policy agenda.” And make no mistake about it, Conservative Victory: Defeating Obama's Radical Agenda, will be on the best-seller lists before you’ve finished your first cup of coffee on Monday morning. (As of Thursday, April 1, the book was ranked #2 in Amazon’s “Best Sellers in Books” category; #33 in sales rank at Barnes & Noble; and there was only “1 left in stock” over at Powell’s Books.)

Fuelner’s email said not a thing about a hot little scandal that appears to be brewing about “Sean’s” keppele (little head). More on that later. Meanwhile back to Fuelner’s missive.
Sean – the Heritage Foundation calls him Sean because he is “our friend” and a “true ally” of the conservative Washington, D.C.-based think tank – “issues a stirring call to action for every citizen who is ready to defeat the radical liberal activism that has come to mark the Obama administration and lawmakers on Capitol Hill — and that threaten America's future well-being. “ Fuelner emphatically suggests that you “should order your copy today! (http://www.hannity.com/pages/conservative-victory)”

Hannity – I call him by his last name because he is neither my “friend” nor “ally,” although he was nice enough to mention me in one of his earlier books – tears the lid off the Obama Administration’s march toward _______ (you fill in the blank). In his first book in six years (many thanks for sparing us), he “carefully documents the president’s affiliation with radical theology [might we expect a note or two on Rev. Jeremiah Wright], his advisers’ history of Marxist activism [is there a Van Jones in this picture], his fight against independent media voices [will Hannity decry the president’s attack on Fox?], and his support for leftist dictators [he did accept a book from Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez!]. Sean exposes their campaign to dismantle the American free-market system and forfeit our national sovereignty.”

If Hannity stopped there, he would have already made an extraordinary contribution toward understanding the historical period we are living through. “But he doesn't stop there,” Fuelner promises. “Sean also draws on the examples of Ronald Reagan and the GOP’s Contract with America to show how conservatives can unite behind this country’s most cherished principles — our nation’s First Principles — and act now to get America back on the right track while we still can.” Uh, pardon me, but is that a veiled reference to Team Obama’s oft-heard election slogan “Yes we can?”

In case we’ve forgotten, Fuelner reminds us that the partnership between Heritage and Hannity goes all the way back to … three years ago: “You may recall that The Heritage Foundation began our radio partnership with Sean three years ago in a campaign that asked ‘What Would Reagan Do?’ Ronald Reagan proved that when our leaders govern according to our conservative First Principles, America flourishes.”

Therefore, it was only “fitting that Sean's first stop on his book tour … [was] at an event at the Ronald Reagan Library … [on] March 30.” And, over the next few weeks Hannity will be making stops in Salt Lake City; Pittsburgh, Penn.; Minneapolis, Minn., where special guests include Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann, Tim Pawlenty, and uber-lobbyist Jack Abramoff’s pal Ralph Reed; Grand Rapids, Mich. (will Michael Moore show up? -- after all the sanest, most civil interview with a progressive/leftist that I’ve ever seen on the Hannity program – and I do admit to favoring Rachel Maddow in that timeslot -- was the night he had Moore on); Atlanta, Ga., where special guests include the newly minted CNN contributor, Erick Erickson, former White House press secretary Dana Perino, and the ever-illuminating spinmeister, Frank Luntz; Orlando, Fla., where special guests include GOP senatorial candidate Marco Rubio and former Notre Dame University (among others) football coach Lou Holtz; and several other cities.

Where does the money that Hannity and Oliver North has raised for veteran’s families really go?

Meanwhile, while Hannity is making the rounds and selling oodles of books, another Washington, D.C.-based organization is sorta trying to throw another kind of book at the Seanster.

On March 29, the day before Hannity’s book hit the streets, CREW (Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington), filed complaints with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) against Sean Hannity, his Freedom Concerts, the Freedom Alliance (http://www.freedomalliance.org/) and Lt. Col. Oliver North.

According to a CREW press release, the “FTC complaint alleges Hannity and Freedom Concerts have engaged in illegal and deceptive marketing practices by suggesting that all money generated by ticket sales for the Freedom Concerts he sponsors each summer goes to scholarships for children of killed and wounded service members.

“In fact, the concerts are staged by Premiere Marketing, which is headed by Duane Ward – also the head of Premiere Speakers Bureau, which exclusively represents Mr. Hannity and Lt. Col. North. After staging the concerts, Premiere donates an unknown portion of the concert proceeds to the Freedom Alliance,” the release notes (http://citizensforethics.org/node/44511).

In promoting the concerts, Hannity has claimed that “Every penny, 100 percent of the donations are applied to the Freedom Alliance scholarship fund.” North has made similar statements: “There’s no overhead. There’s no expenses taken out. Every penny that’s donated or that’s raised through things like the Freedom Concerts goes to the scholarship fund.” 

Freedom Alliance’s chairman, Tom Kilgannon, said that there was "absolutely no merit to the scurrilous charges." His brief statement pledged that "the smear-mongers who have launched this politically motivated witch hunt against Freedom Alliance will be proven wrong as we aggressively defend ourselves in the days and weeks ahead."

According to Salon’s Joe Conason, “Kilgannon offered no further detail than a week earlier, when he and North posted an answer to similar accusations by conservative blogger Debbie Schlussel, who quoted inside sources saying that Hannity squandered funds supposedly raised to benefit veterans and their children. She also performed her own examination of the charity's tax returns, but both Hannity and Kilgannon rebuffed her attempts to question them about her troubling discoveries.”

Conason reported that “At the heart of the CREW complaints -- and the questions raised about the Freedom Alliance by Schlussel -- is how much of the total that Hannity and North promised to devote to scholarships for the children of wounded and deceased veterans was spent on that worthy purpose. The data compiled by CREW's researchers from Freedom Alliance's own IRS 990 forms show that in every year since 2003, when the concert tours began, the organization has spent more on postage and printing combined (and on salaries) than on "grants" -- and far more on ‘expenses.'

“In 2007, for example, the charity collected nearly $12.5 million in revenue -- of which $1 million was spent on ‘fundraising,’ $200,000 on consulting, $1.4 million on postage, $1.1 million on printing, and $500,000 on ‘conferences.’ Another $1.4 million went to salaries. But that year, the Freedom Alliance reported making grants of only $895,347, while retaining ‘net assets’ of over $19 million.”

Conason also pointed out that despite Kilgannon’s protestations, the American Institute of Philanthropy’s -- “the gold standard” of charity regulators -- has “graded” Freedom Alliance “dismally low” in recent years. According to CREW, the organization received a “D” in both December 2008 and 2009, a slight improvement over the "F" it received in both December 2006 and December 2007.

A CREW spokesperson pointed out that an AIP official noted that "Freedom Alliance has repeatedly failed to respond to our requests for financial information, which is why they are listed with 'closed-book' status in the [AIP] Guide. The closed-book status does not affect the letter grade we assign to a charity. However, many donors like to consider a charity's willingness to be transparent when considering whether or not a given charity is worthy of their donation, so we list a charity's open or closed-book status as additional information."

The group’s annual series of fundraising "Freedom Concerts" tour is scheduled to kick off in New Jersey in August, headlined by Lynyrd Skynyrd and the Charlie Daniels Band.

Let The Sun Shine In......

Friday, April 2, 2010

Hannity's Hypocrisy Knows No Bounds


Sean Hannity’s hypocrisy knows no bounds. In the middle of his book tour, touting a book that is full of the kind of accusations about President Obama that would make Glenn Beck proud, Hannity had the nerve to criticize Hollywood liberals for “attack(ing) the president like they did.” Hannity was undoubtedly referring to President George W. Bush. When Bush was president, criticizing the president emboldened our enemies and undermined our troops. Now that Obama's president? Not so much. Or maybe just not when Hannity does it. With video.

On a show from the Reagan Library Tuesday (3/30/10), Hannity was discussing (i.e. attacking) Hollywood liberals with athlete Bruce Jenner and former football player Jason Sehorn.

Hannity said, “It seems that there was a transformation.” Referring to the old Hollywood actors like Jimmy Stewart and Bob Hope, Hannity continued, “They loved their country. They supported their troops. They didn’t go out there and attack the president like they did.” Hannity ended abruptly, perhaps realizing that he was in the middle of a book tour attacking the president and that you can't watch a Hannity show without hearing that Obama is a radical socialist and/or a racist.

Then, “regular guy Hannity” – you know the multi-millionaire who canceled an appearance at Washington University because the students sponsoring him could not come up with a private jet that satisfied him and who charged Brigham Young University nearly $50,000 in travel expenses for a "volunteer" speaking engagement and who won’t reveal how much of the $100+ ticket prices to his Freedom Concerts actually goes to charity – attacked liberals for living too high on the hog. “What do you think it is about liberalism, socialism, collectivism – cause they fly around in their private jets. They’ve got their limousines. They’ve got their… high and mighty lifestyle. They’re going out every night. What is it, they’ve got theirs and the heck with the rest of us?”

Let The Sun Shine In......

Thursday, August 20, 2009

OMG! Hannity would rather see 15 million people die....


Hannity is an idiot




IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. PELICAN BLOGS HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR ARE PELICAN BLOGS ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.


"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON THIS BLOG MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Let The Sun Shine In......

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Hannity's Waterboarding Distraction Trivializes Torture, Minimizes Murder and Appeals to the Sadist in Us All

 As usual, unless otherwise notified, this is an analysis with which we agree.  

We must not allow a policy of torture to slide. It matters not that Obama wants to and HAS changed the policy. There must be accountability. Otherwise, it is just a cover-up, which we all know is worse than the crime.

I am not a torturer, I will never be a fan of torture. Why not just eat each other alive?

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS
by Meg White

The blogosphere is all atwitter over the lastest chapter in the Olbermann-Hannity waterboarding story. The attention is unsurprising; who wouldn't pay to see Hannity tortured?
gitmo traininggitmo training 
I know cheap thrills are scarce these days, and I don't want to rain on the parade. I just hope you know that you're being had.

The Sean Hannity "waterboard me" media circus is no more than a clever ploy. This Fox chickenhawk (along with others in the media) is focusing on waterboarding, when there are much more sinister happenings afoot.

While we're busy obsessing over Hannity's blustering and bugs in boxes, there's one thing that gets glossed over in the torture debate over and over again, on the part of both the government and the media. It's something that has been emphasized by BuzzFlash -- repeatedly.

We didn't just torture people, we killed people.
Though we've been practically screaming this fact from the rooftops, it has gotten little play in the mainstream media. However, the idea slowly seems to be picking up. Today, Thomas Friedman wrote this in his New York Times column:
There is nothing for us to be happy about in any of this.
After all, we're not just talking about "enhanced interrogations." Lawrence Wilkerson, the former chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell, has testified to Congress that more than 100 detainees died in U.S. custody in Iraq and Afghanistan, with up to 27 of those declared homicides by the military. They were allegedly kicked to death, shot, suffocated or drowned. Look, our people killed detainees, and only a handful of those deaths have resulted in any punishment of U.S. officials.

Somehow Friedman twisted his usually sound logic in such a bizarre manner as to come to the conclusion that Obama is correct to avoid prosecuting those responsible for torture, but the fact that he went to the trouble to highlight and italicize the above shows he was half awake (for the beginning of his column, at least).
Wilkerson (part of his congressional testimony on the matter is available here) is not the only source of reports of state-sanctioned murder.

This list, compiled four years ago and made available on the National Institutes of Health archive, details what happened to six detainees in Afghanistan and 11 in Iraq, all of whom died following torture.

A Human Rights First report estimated in 2006 that nearly 100 people had died in U.S. custody as part of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq since August 2002:
According to the U.S. military's own classifications, 34 of these cases are suspected or confirmed homicides; Human Rights First has identified another 11 in which the facts suggest death as a result of physical abuse or harsh conditions of detention. In close to half the deaths Human Rights First surveyed, the cause of death remains officially undetermined or unannounced. Overall, eight people in U.S. custody were tortured to death.

ProPublica investigated human rights groups' and CIA documents and determined that at least 32 terrorism suspects that were in CIA custody have gone missing. The CIA declined to comment on the list, aside from saying it was probably "flawed." There's no way to confirm whether these people are even still living, much less what techniques they've been subjected to. However, the whole situation has the stench of Latin American dictators "disappearing" people attached to it.

With Americans' heads swimming in these many sets of numbers, the individual stories within this sad chapter of our country's history are easily forgotten. This is why the indispensable documentary Taxi to the Dark Side should be required viewing material for every American. The central victim in this story was not waterboarded. Nor was he thought to be guilty of anything beyond driving by Afghanistan's Bagram Air Base at the wrong time. Still, his legs were beaten to the point that they would've had to have been amputated, had he not died from the beating.

But whether or not the government ultimately concludes that these and other deaths were murders, the fact remains that people died in American custody. The responsibility is ours. Even suicides cannot be ruled out.
The military has a history of using suicide as a cover for homicide, and there's no way to say whether or not torture has driven a person to suicide.

There are undoubtedly more terrible torture stories that will be unearthed in the coming months and years, and they will cause Americans to both cringe and deny.

And all these lists, numbers and stories mean about the same as what it would mean if Hannity ever actually were waterboarded: Jack.

(And I don't mean Jack Bauer, but thanks to Maureen Dowd for reducing the crimes of the Bush Administration to wacky high jinx on a Fox television drama and demonstrating that it actually is possible to hate Dick Cheney so much that it eventually drives you mad.)

We will probably never know how many detainees died in our custody, or in the custody of our allies in this so-called "war on terror." The number does not matter. The fact is, the Bush Administration murdered in our name. No matter what intelligence we got from tortured prisoners, no matter who gets waterboarded to prove how pleasant it is, that fact will always remain.

The thing that makes Hannity's supposed willingness to be waterboarded nothing but a trick is the same thing that makes the arguments of proponents of the military's Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape School (SERE, the training program for troops that subjects them to moments of torture so that they can be prepared to resist it if captured) fall flat. Hannity and SERE students know in advance they won't be killed. They know their legs won't be beaten literally to a bloody pulp. They know their anguished cries won't go unheeded and that medical care will not be withheld from them.

Their arguments are nothing but a callous bait-and-switch. And the fact that Olbermann and (most of) the rest of the left seems willing to exchange Hannity's momentary horror for justice makes them look just as sadistic as Team Bush.

Let The Sun Shine In......

Saturday, April 11, 2009

Some of us have gone mad


These same radio hosts were by no means discerning in their vitriol and did not save their ire solely for Obama. The smears ran the gamut, both in the context of the 2008 election and beyond. Immigrants, female politicians (and women in general), the LGBT community, the poor and homeless, minorities, progressives, unions, college students, and even autistic children were targets of these radio personalities' invective. Read more

It's not just Limbaugh and Hannity

Beyond the echelon of widely known conservative radio hosts with national audiences lies a vast network of lesser-known syndicated and regional radio hosts who have become key components of an echo chamber for conservative talking points and falsehoods. Like their better-known counterparts, these syndicated and regional radio hosts have played active roles this election season in promoting falsehoods and smears in an all-out effort to foment hate and distrust among their listeners for the senator who is now president-elect. Read more

Let The Sun Shine In......