Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Thompson: Secession wrong play for GOP

YES WE SAID SECESSION!

These god-damnend idiots in this state, in which I happen to live, are threatening to secede from the union, like many of the morons in the moronic state of Texas.

If I have the first clue that these knot-heads in the state legislature are going to do this, I will leave my house to the bank and get the hell out of here.

Of course this is absurd, but one can never tell these days. The hatred all over the Americas, not just in the U.S., is palpable.

Maybe this time, when certain southern states decide to secede from the union, D.C. should allow them to do so. No expensive war, no huge loss of life, no blood, no treasure....just a proper amount of time for people to be relocated from the region in which they live to another region if they so desire.

Why should the very divided people of the U.S. be made to live together when there is clearly this much hatred between the so-called left and right? As an independent, what I see is a two party system which has helped drive various wedges between the people of the U.S. for their own political gain. Most of that awfully scurrilous business, I have noted, has been on the side of the Republicans.

Admittedly, when I sense real danger, as I did a little over 6 years ago, I tend to lean left. Maybe there is some deep psychological reason for that....though I doubt it.....more, I think it is a result of my having come of age in the 60s and having watched Nixon tear families apart, with his "southern-strategy" meant to pit whites against blacks and the Democrats. Guess he hadn't counted on our generation. It worked for him, but it turned many of against the Republicans for years.

Truth be told, it is probably the children of the 60s (anti-war, pro-civil rights) and their grand-kids who really make up much of Obama's base and most of us are independents. Admittedly, many have joined the Democratic party as a result of the BuCheney Era, as a protest against a political party they see as amoral and leaning toward fascism or corporatism.

Whatever the case, this nation has changed in the last 30 years. It does not seem to resemble the country most of us learned to love. If the people of the South want to form their own nation, we should all seriously consider allowing them to do so.

We clearly do not share each others values, even about basic issues like torture, illegal wars and what the meaning of being pro-life is.

As the Guru said, it is better to fall apart than go to pieces.


thens Banner-Herald | Story updated at 6:52 pm on 4/25/2009


There's no question Senate Resolution 632, a legislative proposal that should have been packaged with cases of survival rations and bottled water, a stash of automatic weapons, a mountain hideaway and enough tinfoil to make fashionable headgear for the entire family, was a Republican play to a hard-core segment of its conservative base.

The proposal, which got a 43-1 vote - including the official okey-dokeys of the local delegation, Republican Sens. Bill Cowsert and Ralph Hudgens - is nothing but a none-too-thinly veiled call to arms, a tangible expression of the dark wingnut fears that President Obama is just a pen stroke away from repealing the Second Amendment, dragooning America's young people into the Obama Youth and generally wreaking havoc with life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

In essence, the resolution - available for review online on the Georgia General Assembly's Web site - lays out the circumstances under which the Georgia Senate believes the state might be justified in ignoring the U.S. Constitution and/or seceding from the Union. It also contemplates the circumstances under which the United States itself might be dissolved.

Thankfully, the resolution doesn't have the force of law. Perhaps a bit surprisingly, a similar measure didn't even get a vote in the state House.

But, even though there is apparently no danger the legislature will include talk of secession in next year's General Assembly, there is still reason to ruminate on the whys and wherefores of Senate Resolution 632.
An important question is why the Senate felt it necessary to consider the measure at all.

The circumstances of its passage are an important factor here, in that they betray a certain embarrassment on the part of the bill's sponsors, which included such Gold Dome heavyweights as Senate Majority Leader Chip Rogers, R-Hidden Compound.

Consider that the bill made its way through the Senate in the waning hours of the legislative session. That's a time so crammed with other business that Athens' own Sen. Cowsert, who prides himself on taking time to actually read legislation - which makes him, scarily enough, a rarity in the legislature - confessed to Banner-Herald government reporter Blake Aued that he'd read only a summary of the bill before voting on it.

For my money, it's likely the bill's sponsors hoped the resolution would slip through unnoticed, getting an affirmative vote in the crush of last-minute business.

It's all a part of what any number of Republican legislators see, inexplicably to me, as the delicate balancing act they must maintain between the wingnuts who will reliably vote for them, and the country-club conservatives who will reliably write the checks that allow them to campaign for, and hopefully remain in, their legislative seats.

Not putting too fine a point on it, it's my view that many Republicans in the statehouse believe they have to show they're just unhinged enough to take the wingnuts seriously, but not so unhinged that they can't be trusted with other people's money. Hence the need for Senate Resolution 632, and the concurrent need to get it through the legislative process without attracting too much attention to it.

The truth, though, is that Republican legislators are going to have to come to terms with the fact that they've got to risk alienating the wingnut contingent.

Consider, if you will, the other plays made to far-right GOP voters in this year's legislative session.
First, there was our own Sen. Hudgens' proposal to severely restrict embryonic stem cell research in the state. What the Republicans got for their trouble was considerable grief from the business-oriented (read check-writing) side of their party, which saw the measure as inhibiting the long-standing effort to make the state a center for biotechnology-related economic development.

Then, there was the legislators' failure, yet again, to pass legislation allowing communities to decide whether grocery, convenience and package stores should be allowed to sell alcohol on Sundays.

While that failure is hailed by the far-right, it is causing increasing ire among less-doctrinaire conservatives.
And, finally, there was the legislators' failure, for the second year in a row, to get anything done with regard to a coherent transportation funding plan. While this was not a big deal for the far-right conservatives populating Georgia's rural areas, it was most assuredly a big deal for the state's business community, the people who write the really big checks to lawmakers.

Senate Resolution 632 might have helped Senate Republicans hang on to their far-right supporters, but the question is whether that was the smart play to make.

• Jim Thompson is editorial page editor of the Athens Banner-Herald. He can be contacted at (706) 208-2222 or by e-mail at jim.thompson@onlineathens.com.
Originally published in the Athens Banner-Herald on Sunday, April 26, 2009

Let The Sun Shine In......

Sunday, April 19, 2009

Why the Bush torture architects must be prosecuted:

 A counter-terror expert speaks out

Sunday, April 19th 2009, 4:00 AM

Reading the Bush Administration torture documents released last Thursday by the Department of Justice - documents all about inflicting pain, suffering and discomfort - I felt plenty of my own.
America is truly about to go through the looking glass. But it's a task that must be accomplished if we are to stand before the world and destroy al-Qaeda.

I have been engaged in the hunt for al-Qaeda for almost two decades. And, as I once wrote in the Daily News, I have personally led, witnessed and supervised waterboarding of hundreds of people - as we trained our own fighting men and women to endure and resist the interrogation tactics they might be subjected to by our enemies. I know waterboarding is torture because I have been on the giving and receiving end of the practice.

This was during the last four years of my military career, when I served at the U.S. Navy Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape (SERE) school. Working there, and helping protect our servicemen and women, was my greatest pride. We especially emphasized escape, because captivity by al-Qaeda's Jihadis would be severe, if not, final.  Our methods of instruction were intense, but realistic and safe.

Now, at long last, six years of denials can now be swept aside, and we can say definitively: America engaged in torture and legalized it through paperwork.

Despite all the gyrations - the ducking, dodging and hiding from the facts - there is no way to say that these people were not authorizing torture. Worse yet, they seem to have not cared a wit that these techniques came from the actual manuals of communist, fascist and totalitarian torturers.  It is now clear how clearly - how coldly - Bush's lawyers could authorize individual techniques from past torture chambers, claim they came from the safe SERE program, and not even wet their beds at night. That many U.S. service members over the years have died as a result of these same techniques was never considered.

This is about more than one tactic, waterboarding, that has gotten the lion's share of attention. As a general rule, interrogations without clearly defined legal limits are brutal.  Particularly when they have an imperative to get information out of a captive immediately.  Wearing prisoners out to the point of mental breakdown; forcing confessions through sleep deprivation; inflicting pain by standing for days on end (not minutes like in SERE); beating them against flexing walls until concussion; applying humiliation slaps (two at a time), and repeating these methods over and over.

Previous Page Next Page 1


Let The Sun Shine In......

msnbc.com Video Player

Amen, Mr. Olbermann




more about "msnbc.com Video Player", posted with vodpod

The official version of 9/11 questioned + Zero An Investigation Into 9/11

Bush said give me a reason (to attack Iraq) in the first cabinet meeting. Someone did just that!




more about "The official version of 9/11 question...", posted with vodpod

Ralph Nader on The Alex Jones Show: Investigate 9/11

More evidence....Bush and Cheney are war criminals




more about "Ralph Nader on The Alex Jones Show: I...", posted with vodpod

LBJ accused Nixon of treason + From Nixon to 9/11

Not surprising in the least.




more about "LBJ accused Nixon of treason + From N...", posted with vodpod

Paying Attention to 9/11 Related Alternative News

Can it BE more obvious?




more about "Paying Attention to 9/11 Related Alte...", posted with vodpod

9/11 FLIGHT 77 PHONE CALL LIES

Well, do tell!




more about "9/11 FLIGHT 77 PHONE CALL LIES", posted with vodpod

Is Obama Willing To Become A Conspirator After the fact?

Sunday, April 19, 2009

Rahm Emanuel: President Obama does not support prosecution of torture policymakers

By GottaLaff

Excuse me? Excuse me??
Oooh. Rahm has maybe dropped something accidentally definitive here. Asked about prosecutions, he starts to answer that the field agents who carried out the techniques should not be prosecuted, and that this is the belief of the president. GS asks, "What about the people who designed the policies?" And Rahm says that the President doesn't support their prosecution either. This shuts a door that was left open by the White House last week, in which the potential prosecution of the people who constructed the torture regime was still on the table. Now it appears that it's not. That's big news.
That's not just big news, that's big bad news.

UPDATE: Video here.